Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Edwards v. Young, 486 P.2d 181.
- Wilkinson v. Fabry 869 P.2d 182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- Wilkinson v. Fabry 869 P.2d 182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- In Re the Rights Ex Rel. Gila River 830 P.2d 442 Ariz. 1992
-
In Re the Rights Ex Rel. Gila River
830 P.2d 442
Ariz. 1992
"Because Arizona has substantially adopted the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, we give great weight to the federal interpretations of the rules.”
- Avila v. Superior Court 816 P.2d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- Avila v. Superior Court 816 P.2d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic Rides 799 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1990
- Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic Rides 799 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1990
- United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn 805 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn
805 P.2d 1012
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
(federal decisions interpreting the federal rules are entitled to “great weight” in interpreting the analogous Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure).
- Wright v. Hills 780 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Wright v. Hills 780 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Varela v. Roman 753 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Varela v. Roman 753 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1987
- Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1987
- Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Rawlings v. Apodaca 726 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- Rawlings v. Apodaca 726 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
- City of Phoenix v. Geyler 697 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1985
- City of Phoenix v. Geyler 697 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1985
- Butler Products Co., Inc. v. Roush 699 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Butler Products Co., Inc. v. Roush 699 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Foremost-McKesson Corp. v. Allied Chemical Co. 680 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- Foremost-McKesson Corp. v. Allied Chemical Co. 680 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933 660 P.2d 1205 Ariz. 1982
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933 660 P.2d 1205 Ariz. 1982
- Payne v. M. Greenberg Construction 636 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Payne v. M. Greenberg Construction 636 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Hedlund v. Ford Marketing Corp. 629 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
- Hedlund v. Ford Marketing Corp. 629 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
- Vital v. Johnson 624 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Vital v. Johnson 624 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Ott v. Samaritan Health Service 622 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Ott v. Samaritan Health Service 622 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- Hurst v. Bisbee Unified School District No. Two 607 P.2d 391 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- Hurst v. Bisbee Unified School District No. Two 607 P.2d 391 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- Desmond v. J. W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. 600 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1979
- Desmond v. J. W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. 600 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1979
- Welch v. McClure 598 P.2d 980 Ariz. 1979
-
Welch v. McClure
598 P.2d 980
Ariz. 1979
this court stated: “We are convinced that where, as here, the rules of civil procedure specifically recognize that the time for filing of a motion for a new trial may not be enlarged, the efficacy of the rule depends upon the willingness of the courts to enforce it.” It is clear that t
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Hall 586 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Hall 586 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- Matter of Estate of Balcomb 562 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- Matter of Estate of Balcomb 562 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Matter of App. in Maricopa Cty., Juv. Act. 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Matter of App. in Maricopa Cty., Juv. Act. 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976