Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Edwards v. Young, 486 P.2d 181.

105 citing documents.

Estate of Page v. Litzenburg 865 P.2d 128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Wilkinson v. Fabry 869 P.2d 182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Wilkinson v. Fabry 869 P.2d 182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
In Re the Rights Ex Rel. Gila River 830 P.2d 442 Ariz. 1992
In Re the Rights Ex Rel. Gila River 830 P.2d 442 Ariz. 1992
"Because Arizona has substantially adopted the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, we give great weight to the federal interpretations of the rules.”
Avila v. Superior Court 816 P.2d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Avila v. Superior Court 816 P.2d 946 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic Rides 799 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1990
Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic Rides 799 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1990
United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn 805 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn 805 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
(federal decisions interpreting the federal rules are entitled to “great weight” in interpreting the analogous Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure).
Wright v. Hills 780 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Wright v. Hills 780 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Varela v. Roman 753 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Varela v. Roman 753 P.2d 166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1987
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 85 Ariz. 1987
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Rawlings v. Apodaca 726 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Rawlings v. Apodaca 726 P.2d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
City of Phoenix v. Geyler 697 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1985
City of Phoenix v. Geyler 697 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1985
Butler Products Co., Inc. v. Roush 699 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Butler Products Co., Inc. v. Roush 699 P.2d 906 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Foremost-McKesson Corp. v. Allied Chemical Co. 680 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Foremost-McKesson Corp. v. Allied Chemical Co. 680 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933 660 P.2d 1205 Ariz. 1982
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933 660 P.2d 1205 Ariz. 1982
Payne v. M. Greenberg Construction 636 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Payne v. M. Greenberg Construction 636 P.2d 116 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Hedlund v. Ford Marketing Corp. 629 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Hedlund v. Ford Marketing Corp. 629 P.2d 1012 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Vital v. Johnson 624 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Vital v. Johnson 624 P.2d 326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Ott v. Samaritan Health Service 622 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Ott v. Samaritan Health Service 622 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Hurst v. Bisbee Unified School District No. Two 607 P.2d 391 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Hurst v. Bisbee Unified School District No. Two 607 P.2d 391 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Desmond v. J. W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. 600 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1979
Desmond v. J. W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. 600 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1979
Welch v. McClure 598 P.2d 980 Ariz. 1979
Welch v. McClure 598 P.2d 980 Ariz. 1979
this court stated: “We are convinced that where, as here, the rules of civil procedure specifically recognize that the time for filing of a motion for a new trial may not be enlarged, the efficacy of the rule depends upon the willingness of the courts to enforce it.” It is clear that t
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Hall 586 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Hall 586 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Matter of Estate of Balcomb 562 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Matter of Estate of Balcomb 562 P.2d 399 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Matter of App. in Maricopa Cty., Juv. Act. 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Matter of App. in Maricopa Cty., Juv. Act. 549 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976