Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leuck, 481 P.2d 842.

32 citing documents.

State v. Shrum 203 P.3d 1175 Ariz. 2009
State v. Shrum 203 P.3d 1175 Ariz. 2009
See, P.2d 861 (1971); P.2d 842 (1971).
State v. Superior Court 930 P.2d 488 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Superior Court 930 P.2d 488 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
We do not “pass judgment upon the wisdom of legislation.”
State v. Arnett 579 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1978
State v. Arnett 579 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1978
1280 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1405 (1958)
State v. Murphy 570 P.2d 1070 Ariz. 1977
State v. Murphy 570 P.2d 1070 Ariz. 1977
It is not this Court’s function to pass judgment upon the wisdom of legislation * *
State v. Starr 521 P.2d 1126 Ariz. 1974
State v. Starr 521 P.2d 1126 Ariz. 1974
State v. Gutierrez 512 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Gutierrez 512 P.2d 869 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Lawson 509 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Lawson 509 P.2d 229 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Johnson 504 P.2d 542 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Johnson 504 P.2d 542 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
[Cause No. 2381, filed 6 December 1972]
State v. Raybould 488 P.2d 1005 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
State v. Raybould 488 P.2d 1005 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
Vacated on other grounds
State v. Kuhlman 488 P.2d 996 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Kuhlman 488 P.2d 996 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Sullivan, supra; State v. Jackson, 14 Ariz.App.
State v. Wroble 486 P.2d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Wroble 486 P.2d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
The record does not specifically indicate that this plea was the result of plea bargaining
State v. Brown 485 P.2d 872 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Brown 485 P.2d 872 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Jackson 485 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Jackson 485 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
and State v. Garcia, 14 Ariz.App.
State v. Nelson 484 P.2d 195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Nelson 484 P.2d 195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
Since we have considered the claim of “Boykin” error without first requiring application to the trial court to, set aside the plea, State v. Sullivan, supra; , it is unnecessary to consider the contention presented with respect thereto.
State v. Garcia 483 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Garcia 483 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
answer the question presented by the motion to suspend and remand.
State v. Sullivan 482 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1971
State v. Sullivan 482 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1971
vacating State v. Leuck, 13 Ariz.App.