Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Continental National Bank v. Evans, 489 P.2d 15.
- Gyau v. Total Transit Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Gyau v. Total Transit
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Id.; see also Cont’l Nat’l (noting that punitive damages are unavailable on contract claims).
- Matthew W. v. Dcs, N.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- Matthew W. v. Dcs, N.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
- In Re Marriage of Benge 726 P.2d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
- In Re Marriage of Benge 726 P.2d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
- Lake Havasu Resort v. COMMERCIAL LOAN INS. 678 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Lake Havasu Resort v. COMMERCIAL LOAN INS. 678 P.2d 950 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- Fogleman v. Peruvian Associates 622 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
-
Fogleman v. Peruvian Associates
622 P.2d 63
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. McNeill, 27 Ariz.App.
- John A. Artukovich & Sons, Inc. v. Reliance Truck Co. 614 P.2d 330 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
-
John A. Artukovich & Sons, Inc. v. Reliance Truck Co.
614 P.2d 330
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
in which the court reversed a judgment for punitive damages for lack of evidence to substantiate a finding of spite, ill will or willful and wanton misconduct.
- Eng v. Stein 599 P.2d 796 Ariz. 1979
- Eng v. Stein 599 P.2d 796 Ariz. 1979
- Lerner v. Brettschneider 598 P.2d 515 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
-
Lerner v. Brettschneider
598 P.2d 515
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
As for the cross-issue of whether the jury properly awarded punitive damages, although punitive damages do not lie for breach of contract, , they are recoverable where the breach of contract constitutes a tort.
- Wedgewood Investment Corp. v. International Harvester Co. 613 P.2d 620 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Wedgewood Investment Corp. v. International Harvester Co. 613 P.2d 620 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- Country Escrow Service v. Janes 591 P.2d 999 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- Country Escrow Service v. Janes 591 P.2d 999 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Wetzel 574 P.2d 826 Ariz. 1978
-
In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Wetzel
574 P.2d 826
Ariz. 1978
Jur.2d Damages § 245, Restatement of the Law of Contracts § 342 (1932)
- Wallin v. SCOTTSDALE PLUMBING COMPANY, INC. 557 P.2d 190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
Wallin v. SCOTTSDALE PLUMBING COMPANY, INC.
557 P.2d 190
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
In addition to the trial court’s allowing the parties to amend their pleadings to conform to the evidence, an amendment which would embrace the issue of the fraudulent nature of the transfer, , this issue was specifically raised by the pre-trial statement filed by the parties and signed by both counsel some three weeks prior to trial.
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. McNeill 556 P.2d 803 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. McNeill 556 P.2d 803 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Acheson v. Shafter 490 P.2d 832 Ariz. 1971
-
Acheson v. Shafter
490 P.2d 832
Ariz. 1971
Gila Water Company v. Gila Land & Cattle Company, , 249 P. 751 (1926).