Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Marana Plantations, Inc., 252 P.2d 87.

42 citing documents.

Montenegro v. Fontes Ariz. 2025
Montenegro v. Fontes Ariz. 2025
Biggs v. betlach/macias Ariz. 2017
Biggs v. betlach/macias Ariz. 2017
See, e.g., State v. Marana Plantations, Inc., (noting that a statute granting regulatory power “with no prescribed restraints nor criterion nor guide to its action offends the Constitution as a delegation of legislative power”).
3613 Ltd. v. Department of Liquor Licenses & Control 978 P.2d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
3613 Ltd. v. Department of Liquor Licenses & Control 978 P.2d 1282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
In other words, “[t]he board must be corralled in some reasonable degree and must not be permitted to range at large and determine for itself the conditions under which a law should exist and pass the law it thinks appropriate.” State v. Marana Plantations, Inc.
Corella v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA CTY. 698 P.2d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Corella v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA CTY. 698 P.2d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors 690 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors 690 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
See, e.g., State v. Marana Plantations, Inc., , (upholding the constitutionality of administrative agency’s rulemaking powers, however, finding the delegation at issue unconstitutional); , (recognizing both the legislature and the courts can constitutionally exercise their powers in determining ru
Cohen v. State 588 P.2d 313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Cohen v. State 588 P.2d 313 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Manhattan-Dickman Construction Co. v. Shawler 558 P.2d 894 Ariz. 1976
Manhattan-Dickman Construction Co. v. Shawler 558 P.2d 894 Ariz. 1976
It is argued, , that it is fundamental the power entrusted to the Legislature cannot be relinquished or delegated.
Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. ARIZ. INS. GUAR. ASS'N 528 P.2d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. ARIZ. INS. GUAR. ASS'N 528 P.2d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
In part they rely upon State v. Maraña Plantations, 75 Ariz. Ill, for this proposition.
State v. Kelsall 523 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Distinguished State v. Kelsall 523 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
In this regard, such regulations, , for the reasons set forth in State v. Wacker, supra.
State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co. 484 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1971
State v. Arizona Mines Supply Co. 484 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1971
State v. Phelps 467 P.2d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Phelps 467 P.2d 923 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
See also State v. Maraña Plantations, 75 Ariz. Ill
Camerena v. Department of Public Welfare 449 P.2d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Camerena v. Department of Public Welfare 449 P.2d 957 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
and State v. Marana Plantations, Inc.
Wells-Stewart Construction Co. v. Martin Marietta Corp. 442 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1968
Wells-Stewart Construction Co. v. Martin Marietta Corp. 442 P.2d 119 Ariz. 1968
we upheld a trial court’s striking down of a statute vesting the Board of Health with sweeping powers to promote the public health.
Security Insurance Company of New Haven v. Day 433 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Security Insurance Company of New Haven v. Day 433 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
In this respect we see no difference in the instant matter than that passed on in State v. Maraña Plantations, , wherein the Board of Health had given too broad a power to formulate general policies affecting the public health.
Bade v. Drachman 417 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
Bade v. Drachman 417 P.2d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Marana Plantations, [Inc.,] , .
DeHart v. Cotts 409 P.2d 50 Ariz. 1965
DeHart v. Cotts 409 P.2d 50 Ariz. 1965
Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise County 377 P.2d 770 Ariz. 1963
Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise County 377 P.2d 770 Ariz. 1963
ARIZONA COM'N OF AGRICULTURE & HORTICULTURE v. Jones 370 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1962
ARIZONA COM'N OF AGRICULTURE & HORTICULTURE v. Jones 370 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1962
It can only be said that, by such an interpretation, the Supreme Court of this state is clothing the commission with a complete delegation of legislative power condemned in State v. Marana Plantations, Inc., , , which the legislature itself specifically did not do.
State v. Wacker 344 P.2d 1004 Ariz. 1959
State v. Wacker 344 P.2d 1004 Ariz. 1959
we held invalid a statute which permitted the State Board of Health to enact rules to “regulate sanitation and sanitary practices in the interests of public health” and to “protect and promote the public health and prevent disability and mortality” as being a complete delegation of legislative powe
State Board of Technical Registration v. McDaniel 326 P.2d 348 Ariz. 1958
State Board of Technical Registration v. McDaniel 326 P.2d 348 Ariz. 1958
See, , at page 114, ; Waier v. State Bd.
Southwest Engineering Co. v. Ernst 291 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1955
Southwest Engineering Co. v. Ernst 291 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1955