Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co., 494 P.2d 700.

28 citing documents.

Brown v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Brown v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Co., (noting a common law “public nuisance is one affecting the rights enjoyed by citizens as a part of the public;” it must “affect a considerable number of people”) ().
Hopi Tribe v. Ariz. Snowbowl Resort Ltd. P'ship 430 P.3d 362 Ariz. 2018
Hopi Tribe v. Ariz. Snowbowl Resort Ltd. P'ship 430 P.3d 362 Ariz. 2018
Co., (injury to plaintiff’s pecuniary interest from loss of sales due to defendant’s cattle feedlot operation); Ariz. Copper, 12 Ariz. at 197, 202 (injury to plaintiff’s property and pecuniary interests caused by defendant’s depositing of sedimentary matter into river system, resulting in “direct individual inj
Hopi Tribe v. Az Snowbowl 418 P.3d 1032 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hopi Tribe v. Az Snowbowl 418 P.3d 1032 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co., (odor and flies causing loss of sales in real estate development); Sullivan v. Am.
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Pingitore v. Town of Cave Creek 981 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Pingitore v. Town of Cave Creek 981 P.2d 129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 959 P.2d 1256 Ariz. 1998
Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 959 P.2d 1256 Ariz. 1998
Co., , (“the courts have long recognized a special responsibility to the public when acting as a court of equity”).
Brenteson Wholesale, Inc. v. Arizona Public Service Co. 803 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Brenteson Wholesale, Inc. v. Arizona Public Service Co. 803 P.2d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
We note that the superior court considered Brenteson’s claim that it was entitled to compensation under the authority of Spur Industries
Graber v. City of Peoria 753 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Graber v. City of Peoria 753 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
See Spur Industries, , , , 296 P. 262 (1931).
Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community Services 712 P.2d 914 Ariz. 1985
Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community Services 712 P.2d 914 Ariz. 1985
Karol v. Board of Education Trustees 593 P.2d 649 Ariz. 1979
Karol v. Board of Education Trustees 593 P.2d 649 Ariz. 1979
Desruisseau v. Isley 553 P.2d 1242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Desruisseau v. Isley 553 P.2d 1242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
SALT RIVER VALLEY WATER USERS'ASS'N v. Giglio 549 P.2d 162 Ariz. 1976
SALT RIVER VALLEY WATER USERS'ASS'N v. Giglio 549 P.2d 162 Ariz. 1976
To further support its contention that it was error to dismiss its cross-claims against Hallcraft and Coe & Van Loo, the Association relies on this court's decisions in Spur Industries
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. City of Scottsdale 537 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. City of Scottsdale 537 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Project urges that the Arizona law of indemnity took on new dimensions when the Arizona Supreme Court rendered its decisions in Spur Industries
Spur Feeding Co. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MARICOPA CTY. 505 P.2d 1377 Ariz. 1973
Spur Feeding Co. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MARICOPA CTY. 505 P.2d 1377 Ariz. 1973
On 17 March 1972, this court rendered its decision in the matter of Spur Industries, , rehearing denied 1972.