Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Parsons v. Bekins Freight, 493 P.2d 913.

114 citing documents.

Chavez v. Industrial Commission 520 P.2d 1178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
*504 (1972), a workman’s compensation case, the Supreme Court “opened the door” to broad ranging exceptions to the finality incident to failure to act within the 60-day period.
Trull v. Industrial Commission 520 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
our Supreme Court realized the unyielding harshness of our decisions in this area and stated: “We are aware that in the past we have held that a failure to timely file after notice of termination of an award deprives the Industrial Commission of jurisdiction to further consider the matter.” “At
Garcia v. Industrial Commission 512 P.2d 24 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Garcia v. Industrial Commission 512 P.2d 24 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
for the proposition that the Commission still retains jurisdiction to determine controversies, even where the notice of hearing is more than 60 days following issuance of Notice of Claim Status, and therefore the dismissal by the Commission was unwarranted.
Garcia v. Industrial Commission 510 P.2d 1050 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Sanchez v. Industrial Commission 510 P.2d 773 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Garcia v. Industrial Commission 510 P.2d 1050 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Petitioner, , asserts that the doctrine of res judicata is no longer applicable to average monthly wage determinations.
Sanchez v. Industrial Commission 510 P.2d 773 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Taylor v. Industrial Commission 509 P.2d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Taylor v. Industrial Commission 509 P.2d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Petitioner’s , the petitioner is entitled to be relieved from the res judicata effect of the notice of claim status.
Young v. Industrial Commission 506 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Young v. Industrial Commission 506 P.2d 1089 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Aetna Insurance v. Industrial Commission 506 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Aetna Insurance v. Industrial Commission 506 P.2d 653 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Aside from the fact that our opinion in Parsons was vacated by the Arizona Supreme Court ( , ), that case was concerned with a Notice of Claim Status terminating the injured workman’s compensation.