Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite City of Tucson v. Gallagher, 493 P.2d 1197.

29 citing documents.

In Re Alcorn 41 P.3d 600 Ariz. 2002
In Re Alcorn 41 P.3d 600 Ariz. 2002
¶ 21 , the plaintiff gave a covenant not to execute to one of two defendants, but it was to be effective only above a certain amount, thus guaranteeing the plaintiff a minimal recovery from one or both of two defendants.
In the Matter of Richard Alcorn and Steven Feola Ariz. 2002
In the Matter of Richard Alcorn and Steven Feola Ariz. 2002
¶21 P.2d 1197 (1972), the plaintiff gave a covenant not to execute to one of two defendants, but it was to be effective only above a certain amount, thus guaranteeing the plaintiff a minimal recovery from one or both of two defendants.
Hmielewski v. Maricopa County 960 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Hmielewski v. Maricopa County 960 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Monthofer Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Allen 943 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Monthofer Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Allen 943 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Ring v. Taylor 685 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Ring v. Taylor 685 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
and Sequoia Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Ha-lec Construction Company, Inc.
Gibson v. Boyle 679 P.2d 535 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Gibson v. Boyle 679 P.2d 535 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
See , Sequoia Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Halec Construction Company, Inc.
Taylor v. DiRico 606 P.2d 3 Ariz. 1980
Shell Oil Company v. Christie 607 P.2d 21 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Shell Oil Company v. Christie 607 P.2d 21 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Mustang Equipment, , Sequoia Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Halec Construction Co., Inc.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Paynter 593 P.2d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Paynter 593 P.2d 948 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Porras v. Campbell Sales Co. 589 P.2d 1352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Porras v. Campbell Sales Co. 589 P.2d 1352 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co. 570 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co. 570 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
See also: , , 65 A.L.R.3d 597 (1972); , Hemet Dodge v. Gryder, supra; City of Glendale v. Bradshaw, 16 Ariz.App.
Mustang Equipment, Inc. v. Welch 564 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1977
Mustang Equipment, Inc. v. Welch 564 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1977
65 A.L.R.3d 597 (1972); , Hemet Dodge v. Gryder, 23 Ariz.App.
Mustang Equipment, Inc. v. Welch 565 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Mustang Equipment, Inc. v. Welch 565 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
65 A.L.R.3d 597 (1972); , Hemet Dodge v. Gryder, 23 Ariz.App.
Hemet Dodge v. Gryder 534 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Hemet Dodge v. Gryder 534 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
While there is considerable case authority in other jurisdictions 2 condemn *530 ing these arrangements as bordering on collusion and tending to mislead judges and juries, , and City of Glendale v. Bradshaw, 16 Ariz.App.
City of Glendale v. Bradshaw 494 P.2d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
City of Glendale v. Bradshaw 494 P.2d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972