Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ronquillo v. Industrial Commission, 490 P.2d 423.

110 citing documents.

Owens v. Industrial Commission 628 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Owens v. Industrial Commission 628 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Borsh v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 620 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1980
Borsh v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 620 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1980
R. G. Roth Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission 613 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
R. G. Roth Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission 613 P.2d 307 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Ramirez v. Industrial Commission 597 P.2d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Ramirez v. Industrial Commission 597 P.2d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
The reasoning behind these cases is that claims should be closed in the order in which the injuries occurred so that a
Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 598 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Elmer Shelton Concrete Contractor, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 598 P.2d 1019 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
As support for his determination
Moreno v. Industrial Commission 594 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Moreno v. Industrial Commission 594 P.2d 552 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Van Sickle v. Industrial Commission 588 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Van Sickle v. Industrial Commission 588 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Gates v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1978
Gates v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1978
we held that where an employee had received a prior scheduled industrial injury, a second industrial injury which would have been scheduled is to be compensated as unscheduled (§ 23-1044 C & D) and not as a second scheduled injury under subsection B of § 23-1044.
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1978
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 159 Ariz. 1978
which concern the application of the Workmen’s Compensation Act to a second injury after a prior non-industrial injury.
Gates v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Gates v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 607 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
and the Court of Appeals decision in All Star Coach, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 26 Ariz.App.
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Industrial Commission 566 P.2d 293 Ariz. 1977
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Industrial Commission 566 P.2d 293 Ariz. 1977
See for typical examples of the application of § 23-1044(E): All Star Coach, , Ross r. Industrial Commission
All Star Coach, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 565 P.2d 515 Ariz. 1977
All Star Coach, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 565 P.2d 515 Ariz. 1977
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Ross v. Industrial Commission, 22 Ariz.App.
Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. Industrial Commission 550 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. Industrial Commission 550 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Mills v. Industrial Commission 530 P.2d 385 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Mills v. Industrial Commission 530 P.2d 385 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Petitioner’s final argument, and again it is raised for the first time on appeal, , thereby converting a scheduled award into an unscheduled one.
Ross v. Industrial Commission 526 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Ross v. Industrial Commission 526 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Morgan v. Industrial Commission 521 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Morgan v. Industrial Commission 521 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Yanez v. Industrial Commission 519 P.2d 220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Yanez v. Industrial Commission 519 P.2d 220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Yount v. Industrial Commission 514 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Yount v. Industrial Commission 514 P.2d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Stine v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Stine v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Bozman v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Bozman v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
E to multiple or successive scheduled injury situations, beginning with the 1935 decision
Camacho v. Industrial Commission 511 P.2d 669 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Camacho v. Industrial Commission 511 P.2d 669 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Sutton v. Industrial Commission, 16 Ariz.App.
Rodgers v. Industrial Commission 508 P.2d 46 Ariz. 1973
Rodgers v. Industrial Commission 508 P.2d 46 Ariz. 1973
Wakley v. Industrial Commission 507 P.2d 133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Wakley v. Industrial Commission 507 P.2d 133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
had not been rendered at the time of the Hearing Officer’s decision and the review by the Commission in this case.
Hollywood Continental Films v. Industrial Commission 506 P.2d 274 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Blount v. Industrial Commission 506 P.2d 285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973