Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Rodgers v. Industrial Commission, 508 P.2d 46.
- Jose A. Escobar v. Marshall Foundation and Pinnacle Risk Management 285 P.3d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
-
Jose A. Escobar v. Marshall Foundation and Pinnacle Risk Management
285 P.3d 318
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
But, he asserts we should reconsider Hoosava for public policy reasons and in light of our supreme court’s P.2d 46 (1973).
- Special Fund Division v. Tabor 32 P.3d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
-
Special Fund Division v. Tabor
32 P.3d 14
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Comm’n, -18 , -48 (1973).
- Hanley v. Industrial Commission 767 P.2d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
-
Hanley v. Industrial Commission
767 P.2d 1193
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Compare Williams and Linville with
- Perez v. Industrial Commission 685 P.2d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Perez v. Industrial Commission 685 P.2d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
- Pena v. Industrial Commission 668 P.2d 900 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
Pena v. Industrial Commission
668 P.2d 900
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Pending disposition by the Industrial Commission, , (successive injury to same member causing increased impairment unschedules the disability).
- Van Sickle v. Industrial Commission 588 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- Van Sickle v. Industrial Commission 588 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- Howard P. Foley Co. v. Industrial Commission 585 P.2d 1237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
-
Howard P. Foley Co. v. Industrial Commission
585 P.2d 1237
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
He found an increased disability of 10% , held that Estrada sustained an unscheduled permanent partial disability.
- All Star Coach, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 565 P.2d 515 Ariz. 1977
-
All Star Coach, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
565 P.2d 515
Ariz. 1977
§ 23-1044(C), (D), (E), and (F)
- Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission 578 P.2d 184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
-
Alsbrooks v. Industrial Commission
578 P.2d 184
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
329 , (vacated , ) and will not be repeated here.
- Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. Industrial Commission 550 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. Industrial Commission 550 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- All Star Coach, Inc. v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
All Star Coach, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
545 P.2d 965
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
§ 23-1044, supra, sections C, D, E and F; , and cases cited therein), counsel for the employer and carrier urges that the injury before us in this cause is the first injury, and therefore cannot possibly be an unscheduled award in accordance with the plain language of A.R.S.
- State Compensation Fund v. Bunch 545 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
State Compensation Fund v. Bunch
545 P.2d 63
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
However, the hearing officer reasoned that he was compelled to convert the previous scheduled award to an unscheduled award on closing the matter because of the “change in the law”
- Tharp v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- Tharp v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- State Compensation Fund v. Bunch 531 P.2d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
-
State Compensation Fund v. Bunch
531 P.2d 549
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
However, despite the finding that the nature of the present disability was scheduled and that this determination as to such status was final and res judicata, the hearing officer reasoned that he was compelled to convert the previous scheduled award to an unscheduled award under the holding of Rodgers v. Industrial *175 Commission
- Ross v. Industrial Commission 526 P.2d 416 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
-
Ross v. Industrial Commission
526 P.2d 416
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
329 , (vacated , ) and will not be repeated here.
- Bozman v. Industrial Commission 513 P.2d 679 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
-
Bozman v. Industrial Commission
513 P.2d 679
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
E to multiple or successive scheduled injury situations, beginning with the 1935 decision