Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Micucci v. Industrial Commission, 494 P.2d 1324.

148 citing documents.

United Metro v. Industrial Commission 570 P.2d 818 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Cardinale v. Industrial Commission 569 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Cardinale v. Industrial Commission 569 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
A. No. In general, it is the duty of this court to review the factual record from the Industrial Commission in a light most favorable to sustaining the award, , and this court will not disturb an award if it is reasonably supported by the evidence.
Scowden v. Industrial Commission 563 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Scowden v. Industrial Commission 563 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Commission 561 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1977
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Commission 561 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1977
Stephens v. Industrial Commission 559 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Stephens v. Industrial Commission 559 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Our review of the evidence before the Commission convinces us that, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to sustaining the findings and award of the Commission, , , the award must be affirmed.
Mission Insurance v. Industrial Commission 559 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Mission Insurance v. Industrial Commission 559 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Pima County Board of Supervisors v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Pima County Board of Supervisors v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 708 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Cheatham v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 737 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Cheatham v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 737 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Applying these principles, and viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to upholding the findings of the hearing officer, , we find adequate support for the hearing officer’s finding that Cheatham’s condition was stationary.
Hopper v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Hopper v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Gould v. Industrial Commission 552 P.2d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Gould v. Industrial Commission 552 P.2d 457 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to upholding the decision of the hearing officer, , and resolving all conflicts in the evidence in similar fashion, , the hearing officer’s decision regarding no loss of earning capacity finds ample support.
Capitol Foundry v. Industrial Commission 551 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Janis v. Industrial Commission 551 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Capitol Foundry v. Industrial Commission 551 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Janis v. Industrial Commission 551 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Viewing it in a light most favorable to sustaining the award of the Commission, , we cannot say that the Commission erred in reaching its decision.
Slayton v. Industrial Commission 550 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Slayton v. Industrial Commission 550 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to sustaining the award of the hearing officer, , there is ample support, both in the evidence and in the law which he applied to the evidence, to support the conclusion that Slayton’s skin condition had naturally progressed to a point of deterioration and was not causally related to his employment with KRUX.
Wimmer v. Industrial Commission 549 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Wimmer v. Industrial Commission 549 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Epperson v. Industrial Commission 549 P.2d 247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Epperson v. Industrial Commission 549 P.2d 247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Having set forth all of the facts in a light most favorable to the award of the hearing officer, , it is clear that the decision of the hearing officer is amply supported by both the facts and the law of this jurisdiction.
Standard Brands Paint Co. v. Industrial Commission 548 P.2d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Standard Brands Paint Co. v. Industrial Commission 548 P.2d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Stephens v. Industrial Commission 547 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Stephens v. Industrial Commission 547 P.2d 44 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Cotton v. Industrial Commission 546 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Prigosin v. Industrial Commission 546 P.2d 823 Ariz. 1976
Prigosin v. Industrial Commission 546 P.2d 823 Ariz. 1976
Cotton v. Industrial Commission 546 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission 546 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1976
State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission 546 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1976
Atkison v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Atkison v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Reviewing the record in a light most favorable to upholding the award of the hearing officer, , it is evident that there was no abuse of discretion here.
Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Harbor Insurance Company v. Industrial Commission 545 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
It is axiomatic that an award of the Industrial Commission will not be set aside if there is reasonable evidence to support it, , and that conflicts in medical testimony are to be resolved by the hearing officer, State Compensation Fund v. Keefe, 22 Ariz.App.
Zambonini v. Industrial Commission 544 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Zambonini v. Industrial Commission 544 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Torrez v. Industrial Commission 543 P.2d 1148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Torrez v. Industrial Commission 543 P.2d 1148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to upholding the award, , the hearing officer’s conclusions are clearly supportable by the record.
State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission 543 P.2d 154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975