Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Bates & Springer of Arizona, Inc. v. Friermood, 507 P.2d 668.

30 citing documents.

Eans-Snoderly v. Snoderly 473 P.3d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Eans-Snoderly v. Snoderly 473 P.3d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Bates & Springer of Ariz.
Don L. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 975 P.2d 146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Don L. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 975 P.2d 146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
See Bates & Springer of Arizona, , (matters of jurisdiction can be raised for the first time on appeal and sua sponte by this court).
Estate of P.K.L. v. J.K.S. 943 P.2d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Estate of PKL v. JKS 943 P.2d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Estate of PKL v. JKS 943 P.2d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Bates & Springer of Arizona
Estate of P.K.L. v. J.K.S. 943 P.2d 847 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Bates & Springer of Arizona
International Harvester Co. v. Fuoss 758 P.2d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
International Harvester Co. v. Fuoss 758 P.2d 649 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Bates & Springer of Arizona, , Equitable Life Assurance Soc.
Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Lincor Properties 762 P.2d 594 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Lincor Properties 762 P.2d 594 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
See Bates & Springer of Arizona, , (landlord’s lien is subordinate to interest of creditor under trust receipt); Schatt-Ajax Industries v. Churchill, 3 Ariz.App.
Kabat v. Nordensson 733 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Kabat v. Nordensson 733 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Bates & Springer of Arizona
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co. 745 P.2d 123 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Bates & Springer of Arizona
Ames v. State 694 P.2d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Ames v. State 694 P.2d 836 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Bates & Springer of Arizona
Lininger v. Dine Out Corp. 639 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Lininger v. Dine Out Corp. 639 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Viewing the evidence and inferences from it in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, see Bates & Springer of Arizona, , we believe the trial court had facts before it from which to conclude that the contract was breached.
Weaver v. Weaver 643 P.2d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Weaver v. Weaver 643 P.2d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Bates & Springer of Arizona
Christy v. Hoke 618 P.2d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Christy v. Hoke 618 P.2d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
We view the evidence most favorably to appellees, Bates & Springer of Arizona, , and if there is any reasonable evidence to support the judgment, we will affirm.
Bruce v. State 614 P.2d 813 Ariz. 1980
Bruce v. State 614 P.2d 813 Ariz. 1980
Bates & Springer of Arizona
Van Sickle v. Industrial Commission 588 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Van Sickle v. Industrial Commission 588 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
424 , Bates v. Springer of Arizona
Foremost Life Insurance v. Trimble 580 P.2d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Foremost Life Insurance v. Trimble 580 P.2d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Since jurisdictional defects may be raised for the first time on appeal, Bates & Springer of Arizona, , Cooper v. Commonwealth Title of Arizona, 15 Ariz.App.