Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Marsin, 307 P.2d 607.

32 citing documents.

State v. Agnew 647 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Agnew 647 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Zaragosa, 6 Ariz.App.
State v. Newman 595 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1979
State v. Newman 595 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1979
State v. Joseph 510 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Joseph 510 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Zaragosa, 6 Ariz.App.
State v. Murphree 500 P.2d 311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Murphree 500 P.2d 311 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Avila 449 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1969
State v. Avila 449 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1969
State v. Wood 435 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Wood 435 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
State v. Villalobos 430 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. Villalobos 430 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. Smith 420 P.2d 278 Ariz. 1966
State v. Smith 420 P.2d 278 Ariz. 1966
where we stated that if the claimed error is so fundamental that it is manifest that the defendant did not have a fair trial, the reviewing court will consider the error even though no objection was raised below.
State v. Mileham 415 P.2d 104 Ariz. 1966
State v. Mileham 415 P.2d 104 Ariz. 1966
State v. Johnson 406 P.2d 403 Ariz. 1965
State v. Johnson 406 P.2d 403 Ariz. 1965
” We find no fundamental error in the above instruction.
State v. Mills 396 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1964
State v. Mills 396 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1964
3 Accordingly, we hold that an intent to repay a loan obtained on the basis of a false representation of the security for the loan is no defense.
State v. Cravin 395 P.2d 706 Ariz. 1964
State v. Cravin 395 P.2d 706 Ariz. 1964
State v. George 390 P.2d 899 Ariz. 1964
State v. George 390 P.2d 899 Ariz. 1964
State v. Barker 385 P.2d 516 Ariz. 1963
State v. Barker 385 P.2d 516 Ariz. 1963
we said: “The charge of receiving stolen property was dismissed during the course of the trial.
State v. Garaygordobil 359 P.2d 753 Ariz. 1961
State v. Garaygordobil 359 P.2d 753 Ariz. 1961
State v. Pulliam 349 P.2d 781 Ariz. 1960
State v. Pulliam 349 P.2d 781 Ariz. 1960
186 P. 586 ; , 196 P. 673 ; Beebe v. *222 State of Arizona, , ; State v. Romo, supra; , ; , .