Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite City of Glendale v. Bradshaw, 503 P.2d 803.

33 citing documents.

Martin v. Staheli 457 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Martin v. Staheli 457 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
This right has been extended to husbands, id., wives, parents, and children, Villareal v. State, Dep’t of Transp.
Freeman v. Sorchych 245 P.3d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Freeman v. Sorchych 245 P.3d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
See Villareal v. State Dep’t of Transp., , ( , ).
Barnes v. Outlaw 964 P.2d 484 Ariz. 1998
Barnes v. Outlaw 964 P.2d 484 Ariz. 1998
Almost twenty years later, however, we overruled that part of Jeune , stating “[w]hen we find that the common law or ‘judge-made law’ is unjust or out of step with the times, we have no reluctance to change it.” , ( , ).
Stillman v. American Family Insurance 785 P.2d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Stillman v. American Family Insurance 785 P.2d 114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
v. Superior Court, , (parents of adult children); , (parents of minor children); , (spouses).
Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp. 774 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1989
Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transp. 774 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1989
In 1972, this Court stated, “When we find that the common law or ‘judge-made law’ is unjust or out of step with the times, we have no reluctance to change it.”
Ambrose v. Illinois-California Express, Inc. 729 P.2d 331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Ambrose v. Illinois-California Express, Inc. 729 P.2d 331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
the Arizona Supreme Court joined a growing number of jurisdictions granting wives the right to sue for loss of consortium for the negligent injury of their husbands, thereby overruling the portion of Jeune which denied that right to wives.
HOWARD FRANK, MD, PC v. Superior Court 722 P.2d 955 Ariz. 1986
HOWARD FRANK, MD, PC v. Superior Court 722 P.2d 955 Ariz. 1986
However, , that portion of the *230 Jeune case denying the right of consortium to the wife was specifically overruled.
Reben v. Ely 705 P.2d 1360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Reben v. Ely 705 P.2d 1360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Mannel v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 688 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Mannel v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 688 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
It is true that children do not have a separate claim, , , (recognizing spouse’s claim for loss of consortium), however it does not follow that the children sued the third party for wrongful death.
City of Glendale v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 613 P.2d 278 Ariz. 1980
City of Glendale v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 613 P.2d 278 Ariz. 1980
348 , , aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds
Taylor v. DiRico 606 P.2d 3 Ariz. 1980
Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co. 570 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co. 570 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
483 , affirmed in part, reversed in part
Mustang Equipment, Inc. v. Welch 564 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1977
Mustang Equipment, Inc. v. Welch 564 P.2d 895 Ariz. 1977
483 , aff’d in part, rev’d in part, , cf. Ulan v. Richtars, 8 Ariz.App.
City of Glendale v. Bradshaw 560 P.2d 420 Ariz. 1977
City of Glendale v. Bradshaw 560 P.2d 420 Ariz. 1977
483 , , petition for review was accepted and the case was remanded for trial on the loss of consortium issue
Mustang Equipment, Inc. v. Welch 565 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Mustang Equipment, Inc. v. Welch 565 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
348 , supplemented on rehearing , on review, affirmed in part and reversed in part
Hemet Dodge v. Gryder 534 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Hemet Dodge v. Gryder 534 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Cress 528 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Cress 528 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Appellants Ashton and State of Arizona contend that the trial court was obliged to direct a verdict in their favor, , , , modified , and Collins v. County of Maricopa, 15 Ariz.App.