Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Direct Sellers Association v. McBrayer, 503 P.2d 951.
- Perini Land & Development Co. v. Pima County 825 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1992
-
Perini Land & Development Co. v. Pima County
825 P.2d 1
Ariz. 1992
v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc., , Direct Sellers Ass’n v. McBrayer
- Rocking K Holdings, Ltd. v. Pima County 822 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
- Rocking K Holdings, Ltd. v. Pima County 822 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
- Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale 814 P.2d 767 Ariz. 1991
-
Western Devcor, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale
814 P.2d 767
Ariz. 1991
v. Foothills Area Coalition, -49 , -97 (1982); Direct Sellers Ass’n v. McBrayer
- Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima County 811 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
-
Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima County
811 P.2d 22
Ariz. 1991
231, (court of appeals heard appeal arising from trial court’s judgment that referendum petitions were insufficient), vacated, , (on petition for review); Turley v. Bolin, 27 Ariz.App.
- Cottonwood Development v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc. 653 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1982
-
Cottonwood Development v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc.
653 P.2d 694
Ariz. 1982
Where a power so great as the suspension of an ordinance or of a law is vested in a minority, the safeguards pro *49 vided by law against its irregular or fraudulent exercise should be carefully maintained.” Direct Sellers Ass’n v. McBrayer, -6 , -54 (1972), quoting AAD Temple Bldg.
- Turley v. Bolin 554 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
Turley v. Bolin
554 P.2d 1288
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
: “We hold that the fact that a constitutional provision is self-executing does not forever bar legislation on the subject.