Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Colvin, 307 P.2d 98.

36 citing documents.

State v. Superior Court 672 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Superior Court 672 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
See the 1956 Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, as amended, Rule 32(A); , Application of Williams, , , ” Under Rule 16.5, Rules of Criminal Procedure, a prosecutor, upon a showing of good cause, may move to dismiss a prosecution at any time.
State v. O'BRIEN 601 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. O'BRIEN 601 P.2d 341 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
cf. State v. Hagen, 27 Ariz.App.
State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
.” 101 Ariz. at 459 , 420 P.2d at 934 .
State v. Hagen 558 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Hagen 558 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Vanderlinden 519 P.2d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Vanderlinden 519 P.2d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Ford 499 P.2d 699 Ariz. 1972
State v. Ford 499 P.2d 699 Ariz. 1972
State v. Sanders 441 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Sanders 441 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Michael 436 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1968
State v. Michael 436 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1968
Erdman v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 433 P.2d 972 Ariz. 1967
Erdman v. Superior Court of Maricopa County 433 P.2d 972 Ariz. 1967
we stated: “We approved the ‘basic philosophy’ , .
State v. Denton 420 P.2d 930 Ariz. 1966
State v. Denton 420 P.2d 930 Ariz. 1966
State v. Gortarez 402 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1965
State v. Gortarez 402 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1965
Defendant asserts as error the following testimony of the witness Saenz: “Q What did you do then?
State v. Goldthorpe 395 P.2d 708 Ariz. 1964
State v. Goldthorpe 395 P.2d 708 Ariz. 1964
State v. Weis 375 P.2d 735 Ariz. 1962
State v. Weis 375 P.2d 735 Ariz. 1962
Upon motion for directed verdict at the close of the case, all the evidence submitted by both the State and defendant must be considered, , , and on appeal, all of the evidence is considered to determine whether it will sustain the verdict and judgment.
State v. McGee 370 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1962
State v. McGee 370 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1962
in support of such proposition wherein it was stated: “ * * * a conviction cannot be obtained on the testimony of an accomplice unless the same is corroborated by other evidence which, in itself and without the aid of the testimony of the accomplice, tends to connect the defendant with the commiss
State v. Superior Court of Cochise County 367 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1961
State v. Superior Court of Cochise County 367 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1961
A year later in a , we again mentioned the existence of inherent power in the trial court to order inspection.
State v. Robinson 360 P.2d 474 Ariz. 1961
State v. Robinson 360 P.2d 474 Ariz. 1961
State v. Currier 347 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1959
State v. Currier 347 P.2d 29 Ariz. 1959
We approved the “basic philosophy” , .
State v. Colvin 307 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1957
State v. Colvin 307 P.2d 106 Ariz. 1957
This is a companion case to State v. Colvin, No. 1087, 81 Ariz.-, .