Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Queen Creek Land & Cattle Corp. v. Yavapai County Board of Supervisors, 501 P.2d 391.
- LEAGUE OF ARIZONA CITIES & TOWNS v. Brewer 146 P.3d 58 Ariz. 2006
- LEAGUE OF ARIZONA CITIES & TOWNS v. Brewer 146 P.3d 58 Ariz. 2006
- Ruiz v. Hull 957 P.2d 984 Ariz. 1998
-
Ruiz v. Hull
957 P.2d 984
Ariz. 1998
See Ariz. Const, art. IV; , Queen Creek Land & Cattle Corp. v. Yavapai County Board of Sup’rs
- Fritz v. City of Kingman 957 P.2d 337 Ariz. 1998
-
Fritz v. City of Kingman
957 P.2d 337
Ariz. 1998
See also Queen Creek Land & , (refusing to bar referendum on supervisors’ grant of a zoning change); , (zoning is a function of the legislative branch); , (establishing appropria
- Winkle v. City of Tucson 949 P.2d 502 Ariz. 1997
- Winkle v. City of Tucson 949 P.2d 502 Ariz. 1997
- Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. Hull 945 P.2d 818 Ariz. 1997
-
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. Hull
945 P.2d 818
Ariz. 1997
See Ariz. Const. art. IV, part 1, § 1(2); Queen Creek Land &
- Airness & Accountability in Insurance Reform v. Greene 886 P.2d 1338 Ariz. 1994
- FAIRNESS & ACCT. IN INS. REFORM v. Greene 886 P.2d 1338 Ariz. 1994
-
Airness & Accountability in Insurance Reform v. Greene
886 P.2d 1338
Ariz. 1994
See, , (“The separation of powers required by our constitution prohibits us from intervening in the legislative process.”); see also Queen Creek Land &
-
FAIRNESS & ACCT. IN INS. REFORM v. Greene
886 P.2d 1338
Ariz. 1994
See, , ("The separation of powers required by our constitution prohibits us from intervening in the legislative process."); see also Queen Creek Land &
- Wennerstrom v. City of Mesa 821 P.2d 146 Ariz. 1991
-
Wennerstrom v. City of Mesa
821 P.2d 146
Ariz. 1991
of Supervisors, , we noted that the Pima County ordinances allowed the Board of Supervisors to impose additional conditions on the rezoning only if those conditions were necessary to health and safety concerns.
- Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima County 811 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1991
-
Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima County
811 P.2d 22
Ariz. 1991
of Supervisors, , see also Cottonwood Dev.
- Transamerica Title Insurance Co. Trust Nos. 8295, 8297, 8298, 8299, 8300 & 8301 v. City of Tucson 757 P.2d 1055 Ariz. 1988
-
Transamerica Title Insurance Co. Trust Nos. 8295, 8297, 8298, 8299, 8300 & 8301 v. City of Tucson
757 P.2d 1055
Ariz. 1988
(“[referendum] does not change zoning as an initiative would, and the notice and hearing process has been accomplished prior to the referendum.”).
- Mecham v. Gordon 751 P.2d 957 Ariz. 1988
-
Mecham v. Gordon
751 P.2d 957
Ariz. 1988
See Queen Creek Land & , -26 , -60 (1947)
- Cottonwood Development v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc. 653 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1982
- Cottonwood Development v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc. 653 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1982
- Citizens for Orderly Development & Environment v. City of Phoenix 540 P.2d 1239 Ariz. 1975
-
Citizens for Orderly Development & Environment v. City of Phoenix
540 P.2d 1239
Ariz. 1975
Also see, , , Queen Creek Land &