Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite McNeely v. Industrial Commission, 501 P.2d 555.

50 citing documents.

Ellenbarger-King v. Fry's Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Ellenbarger-King v. Fry's Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Comm’n, (recognizing that where causation is peculiarly within the knowledge of a medical expert, the medical expert’s opinion must be relied upon).
pds/zurich v. Silberschlag Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
pds/zurich v. Silberschlag Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Aguayo v. Industrial Commission 333 P.3d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Aguayo v. Industrial Commission 333 P.3d 31 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
crescent/twin City v. Ketterling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
crescent/twin City v. Ketterling Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Martinez v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 962 P.2d 903 Ariz. 1998
Martinez v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 962 P.2d 903 Ariz. 1998
See also McNeely v. Industrial Comm’n, , (sufficient causation between employment and death where the work activity accelerated the employee’s heart attack); Division of Vocational Rehab.
Wal-Mart v. Industrial Commission 901 P.2d 1175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Wal-Mart v. Industrial Commission 901 P.2d 1175 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial Commission 823 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Samaritan Health Services v. Industrial Commission 823 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
In McNeely v. Industrial Comm’n, , an employee, who had been taking medication for a heart condition and had suffered a heart attack, suffered a subsequent heart *291 attack and died while working.
Johnson-Manley Lumber v. INDUS. COM'N. 764 P.2d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Johnson-Manley Lumber v. INDUS. COM'N. 764 P.2d 745 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Phelps v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 747 P.2d 1200 Ariz. 1987
Phelps v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 747 P.2d 1200 Ariz. 1987
Pearce Development v. Industrial Commission 712 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Pearce Development v. Industrial Commission 712 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
See, , (normal work accelerating the fatal effect of a nonindustrial infarction is a compensable industrial injury).
Skyview Cooling Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 691 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Skyview Cooling Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 691 P.2d 320 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 686 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz. 686 P.2d 1288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Bush v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 667 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1983
Bush v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 667 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1983
Payne v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 664 P.2d 649 Ariz. 1983
Payne v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 664 P.2d 649 Ariz. 1983
We agree with the administrative law judge that where the cause of an accident is not readily apparent to a claimant, the physical condition of the claimant must be determined by expert medical testimony, , and that the claimant must establish that to a reasonable medical probability.
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 614 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission 614 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Allen v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 602 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Allen v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 602 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
City of Phoenix v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 585 P.2d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
City of Phoenix v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 585 P.2d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Industrial Commission 579 P.2d 566 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Industrial Commission 579 P.2d 566 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Romero v. Industrial Commission, 11 Ariz.App.
Miller v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 561 P.2d 773 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Miller v. Industrial Commission of Arizona 561 P.2d 773 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Eldorado Insurance Co. v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Eldorado Insurance Co. v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 32 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Chalupa v. Industrial Commission, 17 Ariz.App.
Doolin v. Industrial Commission 541 P.2d 1172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Doolin v. Industrial Commission 541 P.2d 1172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Thiel v. The Industrial Commission of Arizona, 1 Ariz.App.
State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission 535 P.2d 623 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Tatman v. Provincial Homes, 94 * P.2d 573 (1963).”
Estes Corporation v. Industrial Commission 533 P.2d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Estes Corporation v. Industrial Commission 533 P.2d 678 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
laced on the series of Arizona cases holding that “where the result of an accident is not one which is clearly apparent to a layman, such as the loss of a limb or external lesion, the physical condition of an injured employee after an accident and the causal relation of the accident to such condition must be determined by expert medical testimony.” , ; Chalupa v. The Industrial Commission of Arizona, 17 Ariz.App.
Reynolds Metal Co. v. Industrial Commission 527 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Reynolds Metal Co. v. Industrial Commission 527 P.2d 308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State Compensation Fund v. Keefe 526 P.2d 1266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State Compensation Fund v. Keefe 526 P.2d 1266 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by