Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Becchelli v. Becchelli, 508 P.2d 59.

64 citing documents.

  • Batesole v. Batesole 535 P.2d 1314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
  • Batesole v. Batesole 535 P.2d 1314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
    ties either as joint tenants with right of survivorship, as tenants in common, or as tenants by the entirety, the court may in the same action, on its own initiative or on petition of either party, order division of such property in the manner provided by title Í2, chapter 8, article 7.” , and O’Hair v. O’Hair
  • Pettibone v. Pettibone 529 P.2d 724 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
  • Pettibone v. Pettibone 529 P.2d 724 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
  • Oppenheimer v. Oppenheimer 526 P.2d 762 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
  • Oppenheimer v. Oppenheimer 526 P.2d 762 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
    our Supreme Court held that the superior court had no “authority to divide as seems just and right jointly held property.” Id.
  • Pantano v. Pantano 521 P.2d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
  • Pantano v. Pantano 521 P.2d 640 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
    The trial court, in the case sub judice, , which was handed down approximately seven weeks after this divorce trial.
  • Reid v. Reid 511 P.2d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
  • Harris v. Harris 511 P.2d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
  • Harris v. Harris 511 P.2d 667 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
    The entire aspect of the trial court’s distribution of the property, both *224 community and joint tenancy, , which held A.R.S.
  • Reid v. Reid 511 P.2d 664 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
    stated that the trial court must divide joint tenancy property equally.
  • Williams v. Williams 509 P.2d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
  • Williams v. Williams 509 P.2d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
    ■ *546 FAMILY HOME HELD IN JOINT TENANCY WITH RIGHT OF SURVIVORSHIP Our Supreme Court has recently, , held that the trial court has no authority to make an equitable division of property held in joint tenancy and must divide it equally if so requested by the parties.