DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Taylor, 312 P.2d 162.

26 citing documents.

  • State v. Dixon 735 P.2d 761 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. Dixon 735 P.2d 761 Ariz. 1987
    Also, the sentence is not so harsh as to “shock the moral sense of the community.”
  • State v. Mulalley 618 P.2d 586 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Mulalley 618 P.2d 586 Ariz. 1980
    “[T]he moral sense of the community” may be shocked when a punishment is overly severe or otherwise not “proportionate to the type of crime.”
  • State v. Reed 583 P.2d 1378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
  • State v. Reed 583 P.2d 1378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
  • State v. Sisk 543 P.2d 1113 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Sisk 543 P.2d 1113 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Stadie 540 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Stadie 540 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1975
    we upheld the imposition of a life sentence without the possibility of parole, as authorized by the statute, as against the same arguments which are raised in the present case.
  • State v. Hunter 539 P.2d 885 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Hunter 539 P.2d 885 Ariz. 1975
    In Jacobs , we held: “ , we answered the argument that A.R.S.
  • State v. Guthrie 532 P.2d 862 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Guthrie 532 P.2d 862 Ariz. 1975
    we upheld the imposition of a life sentence without the possibility of parole, as authorized by the statute, as against the same arguments which are raised in the present case.
  • State v. Williams 526 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Williams 526 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Parle 521 P.2d 604 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Parle 521 P.2d 604 Ariz. 1974
    we stated “[a]s long as the punishment is approximately proportionate to the type of crime and not so severe as to shock the moral sense of the community, its extent is necessarily within the discretion of the legislature.” , 421 P.
  • State v. Espinosa 421 P.2d 322 Ariz. 1966
  • State v. Espinosa 421 P.2d 322 Ariz. 1966
    we upheld the imposition of a life sentence without the possibility of parole, as authorized by the statute, as against the same arguments which are raised in the present case.
  • State v. Miranda 401 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Miranda 401 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Jacobs 380 P.2d 998 Ariz. 1963
  • State v. Jacobs 380 P.2d 998 Ariz. 1963
    we answered the argument that A.R.S.
  • State v. Castano 360 P.2d 479 Ariz. 1961
  • State v. Castano 360 P.2d 479 Ariz. 1961
    we said: “ * * * As long as the punishment is approximately proportionate to the type of crime and not so severe as to shock the moral sense of the community, its extent is necessarily within the discretion of the Legislature.