Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Wallace, 319 P.2d 529.

64 citing documents.

State v. Lovell 399 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1965
State v. Lovell 399 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1965
Either party may question the jurors.” , , this Court said: “The extent to which parties should be allowed to examine jurors as to their qualifications cannot be governed by any fixed rules.
State v. Roqueni 381 P.2d 757 Ariz. 1963
State v. Roqueni 381 P.2d 757 Ariz. 1963
we said: “The extent to which parties should be allowed to examine jurors as to their qualifications cannot be governed by any fixed rules.
State v. Turner 375 P.2d 567 Ariz. 1962
State v. Turner 375 P.2d 567 Ariz. 1962
the-State contends that the knife would not be admissible in a trial nor would it be-material.
State v. Robinson 360 P.2d 474 Ariz. 1961
State v. Robinson 360 P.2d 474 Ariz. 1961
State v. Evans 356 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1960
State v. Evans 356 P.2d 1106 Ariz. 1960
Everett v. State 356 P.2d 394 Ariz. 1960
Everett v. State 356 P.2d 394 Ariz. 1960
More recently, , , this Court reviewed a murder conviction in which the trial court had, on the ground that there was no basis in the evidence for defendant’s claim of self-defense, excluded testimony of threats made by the deceased against the defendant.
State v. Finley 338 P.2d 790 Ariz. 1959
State v. Finley 338 P.2d 790 Ariz. 1959
we said: “It is also generally recognized that no hard and fast rule of exclusion of evidence may be laid down.