Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hutton, 349 P.2d 187.

62 citing documents.

State v. Valenzuela 447 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
is directly in point and unfavorable to his contention.
State v. Forteson 447 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
which hold that, under our burglary statute, A.R.S.
State v. Payne 436 P.2d 137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Payne 436 P.2d 137 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Robinson 433 P.2d 70 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. Robinson 433 P.2d 70 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. Green 403 P.2d 809 Ariz. 1965
State v. Green 403 P.2d 809 Ariz. 1965
An acquittal or conviction and sentence under either one bars a prosecution for the same act or omission under any other.” , , this Court noted that the above statute was taken from California, West’s Ann.Pen.Code § 654, and cited with approval two California decisions construing the same: People v. Goodman, 159 Cal.App.2d 54 , and People v. Guarino, 132 Cal.App.2d 554 , .
State v. Pill 400 P.2d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
State v. Pill 400 P.2d 339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1965
Appellant cites no authority ip point to support this position, except State v. Hutton (1960) , .
State v. Jacobs 380 P.2d 998 Ariz. 1963
State v. Jacobs 380 P.2d 998 Ariz. 1963