Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Marquez v. Industrial Commission, 517 P.2d 1269.

26 citing documents.

Grammatico v. Industrial Commission 90 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Grammatico v. Industrial Commission 90 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Comm’n of Ariz., , (describing each impact or inhalation of silicon dust as a miniature accident leading to the ultimate disability)).
Alvarado v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 716 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1986
Alvarado v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 716 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1986
Ford v. Industrial Commission, 145 Ariz. at 517 , 703 P.2d at 461 .
Ford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 703 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1985
Ford v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 703 P.2d 453 Ariz. 1985
Nelson v. Industrial Commission 585 P.2d 887 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Nelson v. Industrial Commission 585 P.2d 887 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
petitioner argues that since decedent’s death resulted from complications of surgery, including cardiac arrest, the condition should be considered a work-related injury not subject to any restrictions that may apply in the case of occupational disease.
Inspiration Consolidated Copper v. Industrial Commission 574 P.2d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Inspiration Consolidated Copper v. Industrial Commission 574 P.2d 478 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
the Arizona Supreme Court held that when a worker is exposed to harmful quantities of silicon dioxide dust and subsequently dies of heart failure due to longstanding strain on the heart, and that employee fails to meet the requirements of the Occupational Disease Disability Act, he may still re
Torrez v. Industrial Commission 543 P.2d 1148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Torrez v. Industrial Commission 543 P.2d 1148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
*392 , and as interpreted by this Court in its decision in Featherman v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 22 Ariz.App.
State Compensation Fund v. Joe 543 P.2d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Compensation Fund v. Joe 543 P.2d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Yazzie refers to °a line of cases which state “that a disease, which is caused in part by the workman’s employment, can be considered accidental and compel payment of compensation under the Arizona Constitution, Article 18, § 8, 1 A.R.S.” , P.2d 600 (1961); , Reilly v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 1 Ariz.App.
State Compensation Fund v. Yazzie 541 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State Compensation Fund v. Yazzie 541 P.2d 415 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 541 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Employers Mut. L. Ins. Co. of Wis. v. Indus. Com'n 539 P.2d 541 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Employers Mut. L. Ins. Co. of Wis. v. Indus. Com'n 539 P.2d 541 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission 539 P.2d 541 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Featherman v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 922 Ariz. 1975
Featherman v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 922 Ariz. 1975
The Court of Appeals in setting aside the award, took the view that petitioner’s
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Industrial Commission 537 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Featherman v. Industrial Commission 524 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Featherman v. Industrial Commission 524 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
Since this case was briefed