Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Sorrell, 333 P.2d 1081.

66 citing documents.

State v. Barker 385 P.2d 516 Ariz. 1963
State v. Barker 385 P.2d 516 Ariz. 1963
Tn Arizona, a witness may be impeached by the showing of a prior felony conviction, , ; , , except where the prior felony conviction is so remote that it cannot reasonably cast a reflection on the witness’s credibility, , .
State v. Hunt 370 P.2d 640 Ariz. 1962
State v. Hunt 370 P.2d 640 Ariz. 1962
State v. Harvill 362 P.2d 663 Ariz. 1961
State v. Harvill 362 P.2d 663 Ariz. 1961
State v. Simmering 361 P.2d 4 Ariz. 1961
State v. Simmering 361 P.2d 4 Ariz. 1961
3 ; , ; , 358 P .2d 178.
State v. Hilliard 359 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1961
State v. Hilliard 359 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1961
: “The general rule is that the state may inquire of the defendant when he is a witness if he was previously convicted of a felony.
State v. Hudson 358 P.2d 332 Ariz. 1960
State v. Hudson 358 P.2d 332 Ariz. 1960
State v. Vallejos 358 P.2d 178 Ariz. 1960
State v. Vallejos 358 P.2d 178 Ariz. 1960
State v. Holman 356 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1960
State v. Holman 356 P.2d 27 Ariz. 1960
It was recently reiterated by this court in State v. Sorrell, 85 Ariz, 173, 177, ,1083: “The general rule is that the state may inquire of the defendant when he is a witness if he was previously convicted of a felony.