Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Adams v. Dion, 509 P.2d 201.

26 citing documents.

Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & Strawn 907 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & Strawn 907 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Egurrola, 95 Ariz. at 198 , 388 P.2d at 245 .
C S & W Contractors, Inc. v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n 852 P.2d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
C S & W Contractors, Inc. v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n 852 P.2d 1239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
our supreme court noted that “it is almost universally held that as between a third party and one of the parties to the contract it may always be proven by parol evidence that a contract between them is different from what it purports to be on its face.” , and Greene v. Reed, 15 Ariz.App.
Spain v. General Motors Corp. 829 P.2d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Spain v. General Motors Corp. 829 P.2d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
our supreme court rejected the rule that the release of one joint tortfeasor released all others, and adopted the rule in Restatement (Second) of Torts § 885 (1979), that others would be released only if that was the intended result or the release expressly so provided.
Burrington v. Gila County 767 P.2d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Burrington v. Gila County 767 P.2d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Edwards v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, Inc. 753 P.2d 1187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Edwards v. Stewart Title & Trust of Phoenix, Inc. 753 P.2d 1187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Ball Corp. v. George, 27 Ariz.App.
Vairo v. Clayden 734 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Vairo v. Clayden 734 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Huskie v. Ames Bros. Motor & Supply Co. 678 P.2d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Huskie v. Ames Bros. Motor & Supply Co. 678 P.2d 977 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Edmond v. Fairfield Sunrise Village, Inc. 644 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
Edmond v. Fairfield Sunrise Village, Inc. 644 P.2d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
The argument is made that the common law rule governing releases of joint tortfeasors has been rejected, , and that the same rule should apply with reference to satisfaction of judgments.
Howard v. Associated Grocers 601 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1979
Howard v. Associated Grocers 601 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1979
Anderson Aviation Sales Co., Inc. v. Perez, 19 Ariz.App.
Anderson v. Mobile Discount Corp. 595 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Anderson v. Mobile Discount Corp. 595 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Ball Corporation v. George 556 P.2d 1143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Ball Corporation v. George 556 P.2d 1143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Brown v. Valley National Bank of Arizona 549 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Brown v. Valley National Bank of Arizona 549 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
repudiated the rule that release of one joint tortfeasor releases all.
American Home Assurance Company v. Vaughn 517 P.2d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
American Home Assurance Company v. Vaughn 517 P.2d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
Riexinger v. Ashton Company, supra.