DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Van Bogart, 331 P.2d 597.

26 citing documents.

  • State v. Whalen 961 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
  • State v. Whalen 961 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
    (advisory counsel ordered to represent defendant after he stormed out of the courtroom and announced he would "resist being brought back to court any way he could”), , (pro se defendant gagged after making repeated verbal outbursts during voir dire).
  • State v. Hartford 636 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Hartford 636 P.2d 1204 Ariz. 1981
    cert, denied 359 U.S. 973 , 79 S.Ct.
  • State v. Jones 546 P.2d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. Jones 546 P.2d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
    our Supreme Court held that it was proper to gag a defendant who interrupted the proceedings by inquiring “What’s going on here” and stating that he was being railroaded and maintaining that he would not be quiet.
  • State v. Reese 527 P.2d 508 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Reese 527 P.2d 508 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Delvecchio 519 P.2d 1137 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Delvecchio 519 P.2d 1137 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Yanich 516 P.2d 308 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Yanich 516 P.2d 308 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Smith 506 P.2d 670 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
  • State v. Smith 506 P.2d 670 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
    State v. Carter, 1 Ariz.App.
  • State v. Stevens 490 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. Stevens 490 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1971
    Arizona Constitution, Art. 2, § 24, A.R.S.
  • State v. Thorne 453 P.2d 963 Ariz. 1969
  • State v. Thorne 453 P.2d 963 Ariz. 1969
  • State v. Martin 426 P.2d 639 Ariz. 1967
  • State v. Martin 426 P.2d 639 Ariz. 1967
  • State v. Taylor 407 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Taylor 407 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Westbrook 406 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1965
  • State v. Westbrook 406 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1965
    He was given, and he accepted, full measure of the constitutional right.” , , we held: *36 “There can be no doubt that a defendant is entitled to defend himself under the provisions of the Constitution if he so desires.” In the recent annotation (1961), 77 A.L.R.
  • State v. Carter 399 P.2d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
  • State v. Carter 399 P.2d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1965
    Watts v. United States., 9 Cir., 273 F.2d 10 , , .