Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Roberts, 336 P.2d 151.
- State v. Woody 496 P.2d 584 Ariz. 1972
- State v. Woody 496 P.2d 584 Ariz. 1972
- State v. Miller 491 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
- State v. Miller 491 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
- State v. Beard 489 P.2d 25 Ariz. 1971
-
State v. Beard
489 P.2d 25
Ariz. 1971
where defendant Roberts was charged upon a robbery indictment as an aider and abettor, this Court in reviewing basically the same instruction held on page 255 that it was “not inappropriate or improper.” Finally, with respect to defendant’s argument that the testimony of *392 ■Woods as an accomp
- State v. Bunow 476 P.2d 153 Ariz. 1970
-
State v. Bunow
476 P.2d 153
Ariz. 1970
State v. Crawford, supra; , .
- State v. Crawford 475 P.2d 936 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Crawford 475 P.2d 936 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Spillman 468 P.2d 376 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Spillman 468 P.2d 376 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Collins 454 P.2d 991 Ariz. 1969
-
State v. Collins
454 P.2d 991
Ariz. 1969
State v. Roberts, above, at p. 254 , .
- State v. Jones 429 P.2d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
- State v. Jones 429 P.2d 518 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
- State v. Webb 419 P.2d 91 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Webb 419 P.2d 91 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Baker 414 P.2d 153 Ariz. 1966
-
State v. Baker
414 P.2d 153
Ariz. 1966
Hence, defendant could not have been prejudiced when the trial court reread the instruction and quoted from a decision of this court— , , .
- State v. Jackson 412 P.2d 36 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Jackson 412 P.2d 36 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Bearden 405 P.2d 885 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Bearden 405 P.2d 885 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Goodyear 404 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Goodyear 404 P.2d 397 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Barton 399 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Barton 399 P.2d 169 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Perez 383 P.2d 745 Ariz. 1963
-
State v. Perez
383 P.2d 745
Ariz. 1963
ether they *295 directly commit the act constituting the offense, or aid and abet in its commission, or, not being present, have advised and encouraged its commission, * * are principals in any crime so committed.” We said in State v. Roberts: “To aid and abet means simply to assist in the commission of an act, either by an active participation in it or in some manner advising or encouraging it.” , .
- State v. Mathis 375 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Mathis 375 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1962