Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Triano v. Massion, 513 P.2d 935.

18 citing documents.

Matthew Wakely v. Todd Howard Ariz. 2022
Matthew Wakely v. Todd Howard Ariz. 2022
They were rejected in a well-considered analysis as follows: P.2d 935 (1973), persuasive and dispositive.
State of Arizona v. City of Tucson Ariz. 2021
Escamilla v. cuello/cabrera 282 P.3d 403 Ariz. 2012
Escamilla v. cuello/cabrera 282 P.3d 403 Ariz. 2012
Triano v. Massion, 109 Ariz. 506, 508, see Sugarman v. Dougall, 413 U.S. 634, 647 (1973) (stating that “‘[e]ach State has the power to prescribe the qualifications of its officers and the manner in which they shall be chosen’” and that this power goes “to the heart of representative government” (quoting Boyd v. Thaye
City of Tucson v. State 273 P.3d 624 Ariz. 2012
City of Tucson v. State 250 P.3d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
City of Tucson v. State 250 P.3d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
("Municipal elections are matters of local interest and not matters of statewide concern.").
City of Tucson v. Consumers for Retail Choice 5 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
City of Tucson v. Consumers for Retail Choice 5 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
Strode, 72 Ariz. at 367-68 , 236 P.2d at 53-54 .
State v. Noriega 690 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1984
Bearup v. Voss 690 P.2d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Bearup v. Voss 690 P.2d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
We find the Supreme Court’s , persuasive and dispositive.
State v. Emery 642 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1982
State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
State v. McGinty 584 P.2d 1153 Ariz. 1978
State v. Jenkins 522 P.2d 1090 Ariz. 1974
State v. Pineda 519 P.2d 41 Ariz. 1974