Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Brockmueller v. State, 340 P.2d 992.

40 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Bayron Perez Agueda 513 P.3d 1112 Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. Bayron Perez Agueda 513 P.3d 1112 Ariz. 2022
¶18 This interpretation finds support in Brockmueller v. State, where this Court determined that the offense and definition of delinquency “taken together, serve to prohibit the encouragement of any act which tends to debase or injure the morals, health or welfare of a child.”
State v. Denson 382 P.3d 1221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Denson 382 P.3d 1221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
‘It requires only that the language of a statute convey a definite warning of the proscribed conduct.’” Burke, 238 Ariz. at 326, ¶ 6 , 360 P.3d at 122 (internal citations omitted); , (criminal statutes need not describe the prescribed criminal conduct to a degree of “mathematical certainty”) ( , ).
Fushek v. State 159 P.3d 584 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Fushek v. State 159 P.3d 584 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
2 *278 ¶ 13 , but his rebanee is misplaced.
State v. Womack 847 P.2d 609 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Womack 847 P.2d 609 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
While criminal statutory language need not provide for an interpretation amounting to a mathematical certainty, , , cert.
State Ex Rel. Ordway v. Buchanan 741 P.2d 292 Ariz. 1987
State Ex Rel. Ordway v. Buchanan 741 P.2d 292 Ariz. 1987
An issue is abandoned when an appellant fails “to state with any particularity why or how the trial court erred in making these rulings and simply concludes that, error was committed.” Modular Systems, , ( , ).
State v. DeBoucher 660 P.2d 471 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. DeBoucher 660 P.2d 471 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Blodgette 590 P.2d 931 Ariz. 1979
State v. Blodgette 590 P.2d 931 Ariz. 1979
1977 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1030 (1966); , , cert, denied 361 U.S. 913 , 80 S.Ct.
Modular Systems, Inc. v. Naisbitt 562 P.2d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Modular Systems, Inc. v. Naisbitt 562 P.2d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Swafford 520 P.2d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
State v. Swafford 520 P.2d 1151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
State v. Hixson 492 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Hixson 492 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
§ 13-822 , wherein the contention was made that the statute fails to prescribe the conduct which is prohibited.
Kadish v. PHX.-SCOTTS. SPORTS COMPANY 466 P.2d 794 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Kadish v. PHX.-SCOTTS. SPORTS COMPANY 466 P.2d 794 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
Barbone v. Superior Court of Pima County 462 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Barbone v. Superior Court of Pima County 462 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Fountain v. Oelschlegel 451 P.2d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
Fountain v. Oelschlegel 451 P.2d 316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
State v. Hunt 447 P.2d 896 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Hunt 447 P.2d 896 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Cutshaw 437 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Cutshaw 437 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
State v. Horn 422 P.2d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
State v. Horn 422 P.2d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1966
State v. Jean 405 P.2d 808 Ariz. 1965
State v. Jean 405 P.2d 808 Ariz. 1965
State v. Brown 400 P.2d 111 Ariz. 1965
State v. Brown 400 P.2d 111 Ariz. 1965
Middleton Restaurant Enterprises v. Tovrea Land & Cattle Co. 361 P.2d 930 Ariz. 1961
Middleton Restaurant Enterprises v. Tovrea Land & Cattle Co. 361 P.2d 930 Ariz. 1961
certiorari denied 361 U.S. 913 , 80 S.Ct.
McAllister v. Industrial Commission 352 P.2d 359 Ariz. 1960
McAllister v. Industrial Commission 352 P.2d 359 Ariz. 1960