Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc., 519 P.2d 61.

31 citing documents.

Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Mitchell v. Gamble, Jenson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Comm’n, (second alteration in Santiago); Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc., (whether one person is employee of another “depend[s] on the circumstances surrounding the relationship of the parties”).
Orme School v. Reeves 802 P.2d 1000 Ariz. 1990
Orme School v. Reeves 802 P.2d 1000 Ariz. 1990
Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc., , Livingston v. Citizen’s Utility, Inc., , , (even if there is no factual dispute, where possible inferences to be drawn from the circumstances are conflicting, summary judgment
Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 794 P.2d 138 Ariz. 1990
Santiago v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 794 P.2d 138 Ariz. 1990
Section 220 of the Restatement (Second) of Agency, adopted by Arizona, , Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc., , Throop v. F.E.
Arizona Farmers Production Credit Ass'n v. Northside Hay Mill & Trading Co. 736 P.2d 816 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Arizona Farmers Production Credit Ass'n v. Northside Hay Mill & Trading Co. 736 P.2d 816 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc., , , disapproved Citicorp Homeowners, , Restatement (Second) of Torts § 894(2) and comment e (1965).
Daggett v. Jackie Fine Arts, Inc. 733 P.2d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Daggett v. Jackie Fine Arts, Inc. 733 P.2d 1142 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc., , Rule 56(c), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.
Statewide Ins. Corp. v. Dewar 694 P.2d 1167 Ariz. 1984
DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center, Inc. 695 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center, Inc. 695 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Berray 694 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Fire Insurance Exchange v. Berray 694 P.2d 259 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc., , Dutch Inns of America, Inc. v. Horizon Corp., 18 Ariz.App.
Robarge v. Bechtel Power Corp. 640 P.2d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Robarge v. Bechtel Power Corp. 640 P.2d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc.
Sun World Corp. v. Pennysaver, Inc. 637 P.2d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Sun World Corp. v. Pennysaver, Inc. 637 P.2d 1088 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc.
Brockman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 609 P.2d 61 Ariz. 1980
Brockman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 609 P.2d 61 Ariz. 1980
See Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc.
Chernov v. St. Luke's Hospital Medical Center 601 P.2d 284 Ariz. 1979
Chernov v. St. Luke's Hospital Medical Center 601 P.2d 284 Ariz. 1979
v. Arizona Country Club, , because: “In order for the entry of summary judgment to be appropriate there must be no genuine dispute as to any material fact and only one inference can be drawn from the undisputed material facts, and based on the undisputed material facts the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc.
Vern Walton Motors v. Taylor 591 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Vern Walton Motors v. Taylor 591 P.2d 555 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc.
Washington National Trust Co. v. W. M. Dary Co. 568 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1977
Washington National Trust Co. v. W. M. Dary Co. 568 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1977
16 A.R.S., Rules of Civil Procedure; Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc.
Geiler v. Arizona Bank 537 P.2d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Geiler v. Arizona Bank 537 P.2d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc., , Dutch Inns of America, Inc. v. Horizon Corporation, 18 Ariz.App.
Olson v. Staggs-Bilt Homes, Inc. 534 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Olson v. Staggs-Bilt Homes, Inc. 534 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Lundy v. Prescott Valley, Inc., , Gibson v. Parker Trust, 22 Ariz.App.