11315 Precedential Processed

State Ex Rel. Berger v. SUP. COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPA

Arizona Supreme Court · Filed September 6, 1973 · 513 P.2d 935

Miranda

Cited by

Matthew Wakely v. Todd Howard Ariz. 2022
State of Arizona v. City of Tucson Ariz. 2021
Escamilla v. cuello/cabrera 282 P.3d 403 Ariz. 2012
City of Tucson v. State 273 P.3d 624 Ariz. 2012
City of Tucson v. State 250 P.3d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
City of Tucson v. Consumers for Retail Choice 5 P.2d 934 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Noriega 690 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1984
Bearup v. Voss 690 P.2d 790 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Emery 642 P.2d 838 Ariz. 1982
State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
State v. McGinty 584 P.2d 1153 Ariz. 1978
State v. Jenkins 522 P.2d 1090 Ariz. 1974

Opinion text

109 Ariz. 506 (1973) 513 P.2d 935 STATE of Arizona ex rel. Moise BERGER, Maricopa County Attorney, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, the Honorable Charles D. Roush, Judge thereof; and Vergil Lee PATE, Real Party in Interest, Respondents. No. 11315. Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc. September 6, 1973. Moise Berger, Maricopa County Atty., by William J. Friedl, Deputy County Atty., Phoenix, for petitioner. Ross P. Lee, Maricopa County Public Defender by Paul J. Prato, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, for respondents. PER CURIAM. The Superior Court's ruling of August 29, 1973 holding Vergil Lee Pate's statements involuntary because he did not specifically state he waived counsel is set aside and vacated. The answering to questions after the giving of a proper Miranda warning constitutes a waiver by conduct.