Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Pulliam, 349 P.2d 781.
- State v. McGilbry 392 P.2d 297 Ariz. 1964
-
State v. McGilbry
392 P.2d 297
Ariz. 1964
Improper admission of a confession into evidence is fundamental error, , , and need not be raised at the trial.
- State v. Wilson 386 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Wilson 386 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Rubio 385 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1963
-
State v. Rubio
385 P.2d 1017
Ariz. 1963
Its decision “will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is clear and manifest error.” at 220 , at 784 .
- State v. Izzo 383 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Izzo 383 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Rivera 381 P.2d 584 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Rivera 381 P.2d 584 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Kellington 381 P.2d 215 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Kellington 381 P.2d 215 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Hunt 370 P.2d 640 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Hunt 370 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Hunt 370 P.2d 640 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Hunt 370 P.2d 642 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Preis 362 P.2d 660 Ariz. 1961
- State v. Preis 362 P.2d 660 Ariz. 1961
- State v. Robinson 360 P.2d 474 Ariz. 1961
-
State v. Robinson
360 P.2d 474
Ariz. 1961
“The Court: You can’t put him on before the State has finished their case, I don’t know of any procedure like that.” The procedure for admitting a confession into evidence during the course of a , , .
- State v. Hudson 358 P.2d 332 Ariz. 1960
-
State v. Hudson
358 P.2d 332
Ariz. 1960
783: “ * * * Under the law in this state the admissibility of a confession depends on whether it is freely and voluntarily made.
- State v. Holden 352 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1960
-
State v. Holden
352 P.2d 705
Ariz. 1960
This court in the recent case of State v. Pulliam, Ariz., , held that whenever a confession is offered in evidence the burden is on the prosecution to lay a prima facie foundation for its introduction by preliminary proof showing that it was freely and voluntarily made and that unless a confession was freely and voluntarily made it was not entitled to admission in evide