Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mileham v. Arizona Board of Pardons and Paroles, 520 P.2d 840.

40 citing documents.

Long v. Arizona Bd. of Pardons and Parole 885 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Long v. Arizona Bd. of Pardons and Parole 885 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Saunders v. Board of Pardons & Paroles 847 P.2d 1124 Ariz. 1993
Saunders v. Board of Pardons & Paroles 847 P.2d 1124 Ariz. 1993
This argument is based on the definition of “parole”
State v. Johnson 827 P.2d 1134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Johnson 827 P.2d 1134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
of Pardons and Paroles, , a parolee is serving a term of imprisonment.
State v. Gandara 847 P.2d 606 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Gandara 847 P.2d 606 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Mileham v. Arizona Board of Pardons & Paroles
Saunders v. Goldsmith 819 P.2d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Saunders v. Goldsmith 819 P.2d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Subsection (B) was enacted following the supreme court’s , holding that a prisoner serving consecutive sentences was not eligible for parole until he had served all of his first sentence and the minimum time required for parole under his last sentence.
State v. King 802 P.2d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. King 802 P.2d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
of Pardons and Paroles, , Eyman v. McPherson, 1 Ariz.App.
Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc. 700 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1985
Jackson v. Phoenixflight Productions, Inc. 700 P.2d 1342 Ariz. 1985
In Re McConnell’s Estate
State v. Haas 675 P.2d 673 Ariz. 1983
State v. Haas 675 P.2d 673 Ariz. 1983
It is a general rule that a statute “adopted from another state will be presumed to have been adopted with the construction previously placed upon it by the courts of that state, and their decisions construing the statute will be construed as persuasive.”
Cottonwood Development v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc. 653 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1982
Cottonwood Development v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc. 653 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1982
Teed v. Ridco Realty, Inc. 655 P.2d 798 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Teed v. Ridco Realty, Inc. 655 P.2d 798 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Thomas 642 P.2d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Thomas 642 P.2d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
approved, Mileham v. Simmons, 588 F.2d 1279 (9th Cir. 1979); , overruled on other grounds
ARIZONA CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION, ETC. v. Olson 643 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
ARIZONA CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION, ETC. v. Olson 643 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Phoenix-Sunflower Industries
State v. Walden 615 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Walden 615 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
and concluded that a prisoner would not be eligible to apply for parole until he had completely served all of his first sentences and the minimum time required under the last of the consecutive sentences.
State v. LaBarre 610 P.2d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. LaBarre 610 P.2d 1058 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
2 the opinion concluded that a prisoner would not be eligible to apply for parole until he had completely served all of his first sentences and the minimum time required under the last of the consecutive sentences.
State v. Quatsling 609 P.2d 70 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Quatsling 609 P.2d 70 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
He claims that the consecutive nature of the escape sentence totally inhibited his parole eligibility on the original charge and that he should have been so advised
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. DM Federal Credit Union 607 P.2d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Gulf Homes, Inc. v. DM Federal Credit Union 607 P.2d 387 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Sanders 574 P.2d 1316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Sanders 574 P.2d 1316 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
We may dispense with an analysis of its scope because appellant, in the course of his final argument, , that he will not be eligible for parole by virtue of the very sentence here in issue.
State v. Williams 569 P.2d 1356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Williams 569 P.2d 1356 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Thomas v. Ariz. State Bd. of Pardons and Paroles 564 P.2d 79 Ariz. 1977
Thomas v. Ariz. State Bd. of Pardons and Paroles 564 P.2d 79 Ariz. 1977
State v. Malory 557 P.2d 165 Ariz. 1976
State v. Malory 557 P.2d 165 Ariz. 1976

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by