Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Douglas, 349 P.2d 622.
- State v. Lemole Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
State v. Lemole
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
ANALYSIS ¶6 We review a revocation of probation for abuse of discretion and will reverse only upon a finding of “capriciousness or arbitrariness on the part of the trial court.” ().
- State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
State v. Nelson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
An abuse of discretion occurs if the court makes an error of law, ¶ 12 (2006), or fails to adequately investigate the facts necessary for its decision
- State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeli 394 P.3d 2 Ariz. 2017
- State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeli 394 P.3d 2 Ariz. 2017
- State of Arizona v. Susan Irene Hernandez 295 P.3d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-
State of Arizona v. Susan Irene Hernandez
295 P.3d 451
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
¶5 As our supreme court has explained, “the suspension of sentence is not a matter of right under any circumstances or in any instance, but is purely a matter of discretion in the trial court, i.e., it is a matter of grace and not of right.”
- State v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR NAVAJO CO. 903 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR NAVAJO CO. 903 P.2d 635 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
-
State v. Atwood
832 P.2d 593
Ariz. 1992
("An abuse of discretion is that which shocks the conscience of the court and appears so unfair and inequitable that a reasonable person could not abide it.”).
- State v. Poehnelt 722 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- State v. Poehnelt 722 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- State v. Ross 696 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State v. Ross 696 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State v. Gannon 638 P.2d 206 Ariz. 1981
-
State v. Gannon
638 P.2d 206
Ariz. 1981
cert, denied, 363 U.S. 815 , 80 S.Ct.
- State v. Neese 616 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- State v. Neese 616 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- State v. Stanley 597 P.2d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
-
State v. Stanley
597 P.2d 998
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Mixon, 27 Ariz.App.
- State v. Ethington 592 P.2d 768 Ariz. 1979
-
State v. Ethington
592 P.2d 768
Ariz. 1979
P.2d 622 , cert, denied, 363 U.S. 815 , 80 S.Ct.
- State v. Patton 586 P.2d 635 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Patton 586 P.2d 635 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Smith 576 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
-
State v. Smith
576 P.2d 533
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
A court must not make a decision “characterized by capriciousness or arbitrariness or by a failure to conduct an adequate investigation into the facts.” , cert.
- State v. Garner 566 P.2d 1055 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
-
State v. Garner
566 P.2d 1055
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
613 , 223 N.W.2d 92 (1974), is in accord with Shenah v. Henderson, supra, , : It seems desirable to have the defendant and his lawyer participate in the restitution decision.
- State v. Pierce 555 P.2d 662 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
- State v. Pierce 555 P.2d 662 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
- State v. Mixon 554 P.2d 902 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
State v. Mixon
554 P.2d 902
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
the Supreme Court characterized abuse of discretion in sentencing as capriciousness, or as the failure to conduct an investigation sufficient for the proper exercise of the sentencing decision.
- State v. Becerra 534 P.2d 743 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Becerra 534 P.2d 743 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Griggs 515 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Griggs 515 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Settle 512 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Settle 512 P.2d 46 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Sanchez 506 P.2d 644 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Sanchez 506 P.2d 644 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Horton 501 P.2d 58 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- State v. Horton 501 P.2d 58 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- State v. Moreno 499 P.2d 162 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
-
State v. Moreno
499 P.2d 162
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
State v. Oliver, 9 Ariz.App.
- State v. Green 492 P.2d 1225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- State v. Green 492 P.2d 1225 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972