Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Little, 350 P.2d 756.

155 citing documents.

State v. McGee 370 P.2d 261 Ariz. 1962
wherein this Court condemned the failure to comply with the statutory methods for making jury lists, but did not hold that such failure was, ipso facto, prejudicial error stating: “ * * * the defendant has made no showing whereby he was or, indeed, may have been prejudiced in any way by the prep
State v. Loftis 363 P.2d 585 Ariz. 1961
State v. Loftis 363 P.2d 585 Ariz. 1961
State v. Holden 352 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1960
State v. Holden 352 P.2d 705 Ariz. 1960
The contention of the state that the trial court properly excluded several of the proposed questions submitted by the defendant because they related to alleged acts of misconduct by the witness Deutsch which had not resulted in convictions is clearly answered by our recent decision of State v. Little, 87 Ariz. -, , wherein we said: “Evidence offered to impeach the credibility of a witness by showing that he has a motive to testify on behalf of the State or against the defendant is generally admi