Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite McBeth v. Rose, 531 P.2d 156.
- State v. Pariseau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Pariseau
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
at 398 ¶ 33; (“This age factor was to be determined as of the time of prosecution.
- State of Arizona v. Evan McCarrick Jerald 548 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
-
State of Arizona v. Evan McCarrick Jerald
548 P.3d 1110
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
(providing that juvenile-justice provisions of Arizona law are primarily designed to provide treatment for minors).
- State of Arizona v. Jose Adrian Agundez-Martinez 540 P.3d 1205 Ariz. 2024
- State of Arizona v. Jose Adrian Agundez-Martinez 540 P.3d 1205 Ariz. 2024
- State v. Agundez-Martinez 524 P.3d 832 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
State v. Agundez-Martinez
524 P.3d 832
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
¶20 Nearly 45 years later, our supreme court addressed a
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-05401 845 P.2d 1129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-05401 845 P.2d 1129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty. Juv. Action 838 P.2d 1303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- State v. Walker 838 P.2d 1303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
Matter of Appeal in Maricopa Cty. Juv. Action
838 P.2d 1303
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-81405-S, , Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-101252
-
State v. Walker
838 P.2d 1303
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-81405-S, , Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-101252
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court 823 P.2d 1347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
-
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court
823 P.2d 1347
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
(en banc) (footnote omitted); , (“Neither [the petitioner] nor any person under the age of eighteen may be prosecuted criminally unless, after hearing, the juvenile court transfers the matter to the adult side of the law for criminal prosecution.”).
- In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Delinquency Action No. 89248-01 764 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- In re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Delinquency Action No. 89248-01 764 P.2d 752 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JV-110565 763 P.2d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JV-110565 763 P.2d 268 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- McCutcheon v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE 723 P.2d 661 Ariz. 1986
- McCutcheon v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STATE 723 P.2d 661 Ariz. 1986
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-70107-2 716 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1986
-
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-70107-2
716 P.2d 404
Ariz. 1986
we held that where minors commit offenses and are thereby subject to delinquency petitions, the mere fact that the juvenile court dismisses the petition for lack of jurisdiction because the minor becomes eighteen does not bar a subsequent criminal prosecution as an adult on the same charges prov
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-94518 674 P.2d 841 Ariz. 1983
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-94518 674 P.2d 841 Ariz. 1983
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-93117 654 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
-
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-93117
654 P.2d 39
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
In the Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile No. J-86509
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-86843 608 P.2d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-86843 608 P.2d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-81405-S 594 P.2d 506 Ariz. 1979
-
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-81405-S
594 P.2d 506
Ariz. 1979
we recognized the change which the juvenile code had made in the method of prosecuting juvenile cases, and we noted that the decision to file a delinquency petition in juvenile court was a matter exclusively for the prosecutor.
- In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-81405-S 594 P.2d 533 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
-
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-81405-S
594 P.2d 533
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
wherein the court stated: “[t]he decision to file a petition was a matter exclusively for the prosecutor.
- State v. Myers 569 P.2d 1351 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Myers 569 P.2d 1351 Ariz. 1977