Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75482, 536 P.2d 197.

67 citing documents.

Susan M. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Susan M. v. Dcs, E.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aaron W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Aaron W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jeffrey T. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jeffrey T. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Action No. J-75482, -91 (1975) (“If a 16 Of course, DCS fared no better in its efforts, as illustrated by the fact that A.T.
James S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
James S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Even though the court has broad discretion in conducting proceedings to terminate parental rights, the proceeding must not be “devoid of any of the attributes customarily ascribed to procedural due process and fairness.” In re Juvenile Action No. J-75482, (Struckmeyer, J., concurring); see also Ruben M. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Harley D. v. Amanda C., L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Harley D. v. Amanda C., L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Juvenile Action No. J–75482
Melissa W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Melissa W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Action No. J-75482, and Pima Cnty.
Penny R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Penny R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ashley H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ashley H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Action No. J- 75482, (“Generally, the decision of the trial court as to the weight and effect of evidence will not be disturbed unless it is clearly erroneous.
Louis C. v. Department of Child Safety 353 P.3d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Louis C. v. Department of Child Safety 353 P.3d 364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Rhett U v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Rhett U v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
We view the evidence, and we draw all reasonable inferences from it, “in favor of supporting the findings of the trial court.” Jesus M., In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J–75482
Russel P. v. Ades, R.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Russel P. v. Ades, R.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Action No. J-75482, (“Generally, the decision of the trial court as to the weight and effect of evidence will not be disturbed unless it is clearly erroneous.
DIANA H. v. Rubin 171 P.3d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Christy C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 153 P.3d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Christy C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 153 P.3d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Action No. J-75J82, , ).
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 53 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
We view the evidence, and draw all reasonable inferences from it, “in favor of supporting the findings of the trial court.” In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75482
Coulter v. Industrial Commission 10 P.3d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Coulter v. Industrial Commission 10 P.3d 642 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
803(4) *388 (“Statements for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment”), 808(6) (“Records of regularly conducted activity”); In re Juvenile Action No. J-75U82, , Borja v. Phoenix Gen.
Rachelle S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 958 P.2d 459 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Rachelle S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 958 P.2d 459 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
E.g., Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75482
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-6123 956 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-6123 956 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
In re Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75482
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Dependency Action No. 118537 912 P.2d 1306 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Dependency Action No. 118537 912 P.2d 1306 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75m, HI Ariz. 588, Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-M30
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Superior Court 891 P.2d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
ARIZONA DEPT. ECONOMIC SEC. v. Sup. Ct. 891 P.2d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
ARIZONA DEPT. ECONOMIC SEC. v. Sup. Ct. 891 P.2d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
The applicable standard was outlined by the Arizona Supreme Court in In the Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75482, , (hereinafter " J-75482 ").
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Superior Court 891 P.2d 936 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
The applicable standard was outlined by the Arizona Supreme Court in In the Matter of the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75482, , (hereinafter “J-75482 ”).
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-501904 884 P.2d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-501904 884 P.2d 234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
section 8-537.B does not mean that the social study is admissible over her objection, the mother cites Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75482, , (hereinafter “the Maricopa County case”).
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312 873 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312 873 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75482, , Armer, 105 Ariz. at 289 , 463 P.2d at 823 ; In re Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-9956
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Superior Court 871 P.2d 1172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Superior Court 871 P.2d 1172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75m, -91 , -200 (1975).
In re the Appeal in Santa Cruz County Juvenile Dependency Action Nos. JD-89-006 & JD-89-007 804 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
In re the Appeal in Santa Cruz County Juvenile Dependency Action Nos. JD-89-006 & JD-89-007 804 P.2d 827 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75482
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-7499 786 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-7499 786 P.2d 1004 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
See In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75482, , (because dependency proceeding is a civil matter, admission of hearsay raises no sixth amendment confrontation problems).
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Dependency Action No. 93511 744 P.2d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987