Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re the Appeal in Marcopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755, 523 P.2d 1304.

52 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Tynerial Ray Kindred 307 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Tynerial Ray Kindred 307 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Action No. J-75755, -06, -07 (1974)
In Re James P. 153 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In Re James P. 153 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In Re Jerry C. 151 P.3d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In Re Jerry C. 151 P.3d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
In re Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755
In Re Jeremiah T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
In Re Jeremiah T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
See In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75755
In Re Victoria K. 11 P.3d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
In Re Victoria K. 11 P.3d 1066 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
See, e.g., Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75755, -06 , -07 (1974).
In Re Isaac G. 944 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
In Re Isaac G. 944 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
In Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75755, , the Supreme Court held that, pursuant to Rule 4(b), the juvenile court may amend the original petition if the amended charge is a lesser included offense or the terms of the charging document describe the amended offense.
State v. Garcia 860 P.2d 498 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Garcia 860 P.2d 498 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
n offense is a lesser-included offense, a court may consider two bases: ‘(1) the included offense is by its very nature always a constituent part of the major offense charged; or (2) the terms of the charging document describe the lesser offense even though the lesser offense would not always form a constituent part of the major offense charged.’ In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75755
State v. Woods 815 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Woods 815 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
366, citing In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75755
State v. Kozan 706 P.2d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Kozan 706 P.2d 753 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
urt may consider two bases: ‘1) the included offense is by its very nature always a constituent part of the major offense charged; or 2) the terms of the charging document describe the lesser offense even though the lesser offense would not always form a constituent part of the major offense charged.’” 139 Ariz. at 366 , 678 P.2d at 947 , quoting In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75755
State v. Gooch 678 P.2d 946 Ariz. 1984
State v. Gooch 678 P.2d 946 Ariz. 1984
In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75755
State v. Patton 665 P.2d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Patton 665 P.2d 587 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Cousin 664 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Cousin 664 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Malloy 639 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1981
State v. Malloy 639 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1981
In re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75755
State v. Rineer 639 P.2d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Rineer 639 P.2d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
In re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action J-75755
State v. Van Dyke 621 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1980
State v. Van Dyke 621 P.2d 22 Ariz. 1980
We have on many occasions said a breaking or otherwise unlawful entry are not elements of burglary, , , , In re Appeal in Maricopa Juvenile Action No. J-75755, , , State v. Hogue, 15 Ariz.App.
State v. Laffoon 610 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1980
State v. Laffoon 610 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1980
Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75755
State v. Dugan 608 P.2d 771 Ariz. 1980
State v. Dugan 608 P.2d 771 Ariz. 1980
In re Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action # J-75755
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-84536-S 617 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-84536-S 617 P.2d 54 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
560 , In re Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755
State v. Caudillo 604 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1979
State v. Caudillo 604 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1979
Action No. J —75755, , contains a succinct exposition of the tests for “included” offenses: This may occur under two circumstances: (1) the included offense is by its very nature always a constituent part of the major offense charged; or (2) the terms of the charging document describe the lesser offense ev
State v. Rivera 602 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Rivera 602 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
In re Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action
State v. Gray 595 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1979
State v. Dailey 596 P.2d 716 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Dailey 596 P.2d 716 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Starr 581 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Starr 581 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J—75755, , see also
State v. Calvery 571 P.2d 300 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Calvery 571 P.2d 300 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
In re Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755
State v. Estrada 552 P.2d 772 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Estrada 552 P.2d 772 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
In re Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755, , , Peterson v. Jacobson, 2 Ariz.App.
State v. Madrid 552 P.2d 451 Ariz. 1976