Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Carroll v. Kalar, 545 P.2d 411.

25 citing documents.

STEPHENS v. STATE Ariz. 2026
See Bradshaw, 157 Ariz. at 417
Stephens v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Stephens v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Accursio v. Tree House Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Accursio v. Tree House Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
(noting that “[t]he essential elements which must be shown to establish a malicious prosecution action” include “the institution of a proceeding”) (emphasis added).
Cain v. Fidelity Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Cain v. Fidelity Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(citations omitted).4 We review the grant of summary judgment de novo.
Rhythm v. Beckwith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Rhythm v. Beckwith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The plaintiff’s “failure to establish a lack of probable cause is a complete defense to an action for [wrongful use of civil proceedings].”
Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Austin v. W. Surprise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Probable Cause Existed for West Surprise’s Underlying Damages Claim ¶12 “The failure to establish a lack of probable cause is a complete defense to an action for malicious prosecution.”
Chalpin v. Snyder 207 P.3d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Chalpin v. Snyder 207 P.3d 666 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
at 509, ¶ 25 , 80 P.3d at 788 (emphasis in original) (-99 , -15 (1976)).
Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero 83 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. Guerrero 83 P.3d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
In the former setting an adverse lawyer may be sued, see, , in the latter setting an adverse lawyer may not be sued, see, e.g., Green Acres Trust, 141 Ariz. at 613 , 688 P.2d at 621 .
Wolfinger v. Cheche 80 P.3d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Wolfinger v. Cheche 80 P.3d 783 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Co., -17, -19 (1988) ( , ).
Smith v. Lucia 842 P.2d 1303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Smith v. Lucia 842 P.2d 1303 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 758 P.2d 1313 Ariz. 1988
Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 758 P.2d 1313 Ariz. 1988
Hansen v. Garcia, Fletcher, Lund and McVean 713 P.2d 1263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Hansen v. Garcia, Fletcher, Lund and McVean 713 P.2d 1263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Sarwark Motor Sales, , , , cert.
Bird v. Rothman 627 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Bird v. Rothman 627 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981