Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Johnson v. Elliott, 537 P.2d 927.

27 citing documents.

Randall v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Randall v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(citation omitted); (citations omitted).
Villa v. Furar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Villa v. Furar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
As applied to civil cases, fundamental error is defined as “error which goes to the foundation of the case, or which takes from a party a right essential to his case.”
Wiggs v. City of Phoenix 4 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Wiggs v. City of Phoenix 4 P.3d 413 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Fundamental error is error that "goes to the foundation of the case or which takes from a party a right essential to his case.” Long, 131 Ariz. at 217 , 639 P.2d at 1042 ( , ).
Williams v. Thude 934 P.2d 1349 Ariz. 1997
Williams v. Thude 934 P.2d 1349 Ariz. 1997
State v. Lautzenheiser 881 P.2d 339 Ariz. 1994
Trantor v. Fredrikson 878 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1994
Trantor v. Fredrikson 878 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1994
Even if the doctrine of fundamental error applied to civil cases, , it would only apply when the error goes to the foundation of the case or deprives a party of a fair trial.
Williams v. Thude 885 P.2d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Williams v. Thude 885 P.2d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Fundamental error is that which goes to the very foundation of a case, , or takes an essential right from a party, , or, as discussed above, deprives a party of a fair trial, , or deprives a party of a constitutional right.
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 861 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp. 861 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Fundamental error is that which goes to the very foundation of a case, , or takes an essential right from a party, , or deprives a party of a fair trial, , or, as discussed above, deprives a party of a constitutional right.
Ace Automotive Products, Inc. v. Van Duyne 750 P.2d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Ace Automotive Products, Inc. v. Van Duyne 750 P.2d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
This doctrine is applied sparingly in civil cases, , and we find no occasion for its application here.
James v. Cox 634 P.2d 964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
James v. Cox 634 P.2d 964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Long v. Corvo 639 P.2d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Long v. Corvo 639 P.2d 1041 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Helena Chemical Co. v. Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc. 616 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Helena Chemical Co. v. Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc. 616 P.2d 908 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Harries v. United States, 350 F.2d 231 (9th Cir. 1965)
Reeves v. Markle 579 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1978
Reeves v. Markle 579 P.2d 1382 Ariz. 1978
Cano v. Neill, 12 Ariz.App.
City of Glendale v. Bradshaw 560 P.2d 420 Ariz. 1977
City of Glendale v. Bradshaw 560 P.2d 420 Ariz. 1977
overruled on other grounds, , , Joy v. Raley