Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite County of Maricopa v. Sperry Rand Corporation, 544 P.2d 1094.

26 citing documents.

Mesquite v. Ador Ariz. 2024
Mesquite v. Ador Ariz. 2024
market, and cost approaches to property valuation); (“There are three accepted approaches to estimating value: (1) the reproduction cost of the property, (2) income projected into the future (capitalization of income), and (3) market data appraisal which is the comparison of sales of similar property.”); (“The three commonly recognized approaches to value (cost, income, and market) should be considered .
Mesquite v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Mesquite v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Transwestern v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Transwestern v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Swvp-Gts Mr v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Swvp-Gts Mr v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Eurofresh, Inc. v. Graham County 187 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Eurofresh, Inc. v. Graham County 187 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
581 n., , 1096 n. (1976).
Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa County 88 P.3d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa County 88 P.3d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc. v. Maricopa County 782 P.2d 1174 Ariz. 1989
Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc. v. Maricopa County 782 P.2d 1174 Ariz. 1989
Mott's Inc. of Mississippi v. Coco's Family Restaurant 762 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Mott's Inc. of Mississippi v. Coco's Family Restaurant 762 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 709 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 709 P.2d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Department of Revenue v. Transamerica Title Company, supra; see also, Trico, supra.
Transamerica Insurance v. Trout 701 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Transamerica Insurance v. Trout 701 P.2d 851 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
See also, , , American Eagle Fire Ins.
State v. Grilz 666 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1983
State v. Grilz 666 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1983
See Department of Property Valuation v. Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc., , , Graham County v. Graham County Electric Cooperative, Inc., , , (presumption established by A.R.S.
Parkinson v. Farmers Insurance 594 P.2d 1039 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Parkinson v. Farmers Insurance 594 P.2d 1039 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Gunther & Shirley Co., 5 Ariz.App.
Department of Revenue v. Transamerica Title Insurance 570 P.2d 797 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Department of Revenue v. Transamerica Title Insurance 570 P.2d 797 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
although the three commonly recognized approaches to value should be considered and it may be error to use only one method without consideration of the other, there are instances where only one method or approach to value can be used.