Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., 542 P.2d 1102.

30 citing documents.

Lohmeier v. Hammer 148 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Lohmeier v. Hammer 148 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
See Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc.
Bolm v. Custodian of Records of Tucson Police Department 969 P.2d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Bolm v. Custodian of Records of Tucson Police Department 969 P.2d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
See Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc.
Cella Barr Associates, Inc. v. Cohen 868 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Cella Barr Associates, Inc. v. Cohen 868 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
See, e.g., King & Johnson, 123 Ariz. at 258 , 599 P.2d at 214 ; Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., , supp. op.
Dietz v. General Electric Co. 821 P.2d 166 Ariz. 1991
Dietz v. General Electric Co. 821 P.2d 166 Ariz. 1991
See, e.g., Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc.
DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. Industrial Commission 819 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
DKI Corp./Sylvan Pools v. Industrial Commission 819 P.2d 943 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See, e.g., Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., , (characterizing superseding intervening negligence of third party as defense); Knight v. Miller, 503 So.2d 120, 124 (La.App.1987) (burden on plaintiff to show that aggravation not the result of distinct intervening act for which defendant not responsible); Rossell v. Volkswagen of America, 147 A
Boy v. Fremont Indemnity Co. 742 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Boy v. Fremont Indemnity Co. 742 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
E.g., Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., , (employer’s contributory negligence); , (post-judgment interest); *337 , cert.
National Indemnity Co. v. St. Paul Insurance Companies 724 P.2d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
National Indemnity Co. v. St. Paul Insurance Companies 724 P.2d 578 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., , , rehearing denied
James v. Cox 634 P.2d 964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
James v. Cox 634 P.2d 964 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., P.2d 1102 (1975)
Spanier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 623 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Spanier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 623 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
76 , Stroud v. Dor-Oliver, Inc.
Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Parness v. City of Tempe 600 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
The Arizona Supreme Court in Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., , reiterated and applied the definitions of intervening and superseding cause set forth in City of Phoenix v. Schroeder.
King & Johnson Rental Equipment Co. v. Superior Court 599 P.2d 212 Ariz. 1979
King & Johnson Rental Equipment Co. v. Superior Court 599 P.2d 212 Ariz. 1979
McKee responds that, on the contrary, it is applicable on the facts of the case and that several Arizona cases have specifically adopted this section, citing Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., , Sequoia Mfg.
King & Johnson Rental Equipment Co. v. Superior Court 599 P.2d 232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
King & Johnson Rental Equipment Co. v. Superior Court 599 P.2d 232 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
185 , Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., , , reh.
Shell Oil Co. v. Gutierrez 581 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Shell Oil Co. v. Gutierrez 581 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc.
Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co. 570 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Sequoia Manufacturing Co. v. Halec Construction Co. 570 P.2d 782 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
523 , Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., , and authorities cited therein.
International Harvester Co. v. Chiarello 555 P.2d 670 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
International Harvester Co. v. Chiarello 555 P.2d 670 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
See Stroud v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., , State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Factory Mutual Insurance Co., 22 Ariz.App.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by