Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Walker v. Davies, 550 P.2d 230.

32 citing documents.

Legacy Foundation Action v. Citizens Clean Election Ariz. 2023
Legacy Foundation Action v. Citizens Clean Election Ariz. 2023
Comm’n, ); –43 ¶ 22 (2020); Tube City Min.
David C. Shinn v. Az boec/freeman Ariz. 2022
David C. Shinn v. Az boec/freeman Ariz. 2022
In sum, unlike void orders or judgments, voidable ones are not subject to “collateral attack.”
Stevens-El v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Stevens-El v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Legacy v. Citizens Clean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Legacy v. Citizens Clean Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
See, -43, ¶ 22 (2020) (); Sch.
State v. Balli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Balli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Abelardo Chaparro v. David C Shinn 459 P.3d 50 Ariz. 2020
Abelardo Chaparro v. David C Shinn 459 P.3d 50 Ariz. 2020
(stating a judgment that is “void upon its face” may be collaterally attacked at any time).
Merrick v. D. Hurley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Merrick v. D. Hurley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Duncan v. Progressive Preferred Ins. Co. 258 P.3d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Duncan v. Progressive Preferred Ins. Co. 258 P.3d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Stout v. State Compensation Fund 44 P.3d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Stout v. State Compensation Fund 44 P.3d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., , , which hold that a judgment cannot be collaterally attacked, even for fraud, unless it is “void on its face.” ¶ 10 The cited cases, however, involve attacks on a judgment rendered in a prior proceeding in which the attacker was either a party to the prior proceeding or closely asso *303 dated wit
Byers v. Wik 818 P.2d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Byers v. Wik 818 P.2d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
(judgment lien may be foreclosed either by levy and sale or by separate suit for equitable decree of foreclosure).
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-7135 747 P.2d 633 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-7135 747 P.2d 633 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
2 , (citing School Dist.
Gilbreath v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 685 P.2d 729 Ariz. 1984
Gilbreath v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 685 P.2d 729 Ariz. 1984
Evans v. Young 661 P.2d 1148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Evans v. Young 661 P.2d 1148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
2 See Walker v. Davies, *450
Ibach v. Ibach 600 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Ibach v. Ibach 600 P.2d 1375 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Jackson v. Industrial Commission 592 P.2d 1270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Jackson v. Industrial Commission 592 P.2d 1270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
Roberson v. Teel, 20 Ariz.App.
City of Scottsdale v. Eller Outdoor Advertising Co. of Arizona, Inc. 579 P.2d 590 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
City of Scottsdale v. Eller Outdoor Advertising Co. of Arizona, Inc. 579 P.2d 590 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by