Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Silvas, 372 P.2d 718.
-
State of Arizona v. Dimitri Polanco Romero
Ariz. 2026
¶ 118 (2024) (sufficiency of the evidence); (sufficiency of the evidence); Bible, 175 Ariz. at 595 (motion for judgment of acquittal); 392 (1962) (motion for new trial); ¶ 2 (App. 1998) (suppression rulings).
- State v. Contreras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Contreras Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
- State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
-
State v. Moody
94 P.3d 1119
Ariz. 2004
¶ 55 We will upset a trial court’s determination of a criminal defendant’s competency only for an “abuse of discretion.” , (citing Reid, 87 Ariz. at 123 , 348 P.2d at 731 ).
- State v. Politte 664 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- State v. Politte 664 P.2d 661 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- State v. Compton 621 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
-
State v. Compton
621 P.2d 926
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
and State v. Melcher, 15 Ariz.App.
- State v. Stevens 490 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Stevens 490 P.2d 571 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Melcher 487 P.2d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
- State v. Melcher 487 P.2d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
- State v. Moreno 483 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Moreno 483 P.2d 786 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Rhymes 480 P.2d 662 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Rhymes 480 P.2d 662 Ariz. 1971
- State v. Bradley 433 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1967
- State v. Bradley 433 P.2d 273 Ariz. 1967
- State v. Stout 425 P.2d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
- State v. Stout 425 P.2d 582 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1967
- State v. Foggy 420 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Foggy 420 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Acosta 416 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Acosta 416 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Turner 416 P.2d 409 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Turner 416 P.2d 409 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Narten 407 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Narten 407 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Mangrum 403 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Mangrum 403 P.2d 925 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Maxwell 391 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Maxwell 391 P.2d 560 Ariz. 1964
- State v. George 390 P.2d 899 Ariz. 1964
- State v. George 390 P.2d 899 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Tynes 389 P.2d 125 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Tynes 389 P.2d 125 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Woolery 378 P.2d 751 Ariz. 1963
-
State v. Woolery
378 P.2d 751
Ariz. 1963
that "[i]t has long been the rule of this Court that if improper statements are made by counsel during the trial it is the duty of opposing counsel to register an objection thereto so that the court may make a correction by proper instruction”.
- State v. Chance 377 P.2d 197 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Chance 377 P.2d 197 Ariz. 1962