Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Loftis, 363 P.2d 585.
- State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Rienhardt 951 P.2d 454 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Swinburne 569 P.2d 833 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Swinburne 569 P.2d 833 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Hatton 568 P.2d 1040 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Hatton 568 P.2d 1040 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Arnold 549 P.2d 1060 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Arnold 549 P.2d 1060 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Delvecchio 519 P.2d 1137 Ariz. 1974
-
State v. Delvecchio
519 P.2d 1137
Ariz. 1974
The ruling of the trial court in rejecting the motion to recall the witness Hurley was not an abuse of discretion and will not be disturbed on appeal.” -406
- State v. Belcher 514 P.2d 472 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Belcher 514 P.2d 472 Ariz. 1973
- State v. White 494 P.2d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
-
State v. White
494 P.2d 714
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
State v. Roderick, 9 Ariz.App.
- State v. Johnson 479 P.2d 424 Ariz. 1971
-
State v. Johnson
479 P.2d 424
Ariz. 1971
The question of the witness’ at 405 , at 586 .
- State v. Andrews 476 P.2d 673 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Andrews 476 P.2d 673 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Adair 469 P.2d 823 Ariz. 1970
-
State v. Adair
469 P.2d 823
Ariz. 1970
We have on other occasions approved the admissibility of conduct evidencing a consciousness of guilt such as flight, , ; , ; fabricating evidence, , ; State v. Loftis, supra; and subornation, , .
- State v. Saiz 454 P.2d 152 Ariz. 1969
- State v. Saiz 454 P.2d 152 Ariz. 1969
- State v. Roderick 448 P.2d 891 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
-
State v. Roderick
448 P.2d 891
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
A wéll-recognized exception, in this jurisdiction, to exclusion of evidence tending to show .the commission of a crime distinct and independent of that for which the defendant is bn trial, is that of proof of a defendant’s flight or attempted flight after the commission of the offense:
- State v. Enriquez 430 P.2d 422 Ariz. 1967
- State v. Enriquez 430 P.2d 422 Ariz. 1967
- Loftis v. State Ex Rel. Eyman 417 P.2d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
- Loftis v. State Ex Rel. Eyman 417 P.2d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
- State v. White 416 P.2d 597 Ariz. 1966
- State v. White 416 P.2d 597 Ariz. 1966
- State v. Reyes 408 P.2d 400 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Reyes 408 P.2d 400 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Taylor 407 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Taylor 407 P.2d 59 Ariz. 1965
- State v. Sowards 406 P.2d 202 Ariz. 1965
-
State v. Sowards
406 P.2d 202
Ariz. 1965
This Court recognizes that conduct may be evidence of consciousness of guilt
- State v. DeVinney 403 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1965
-
State v. DeVinney
403 P.2d 921
Ariz. 1965
The State points out that this was not urged in support of his motion for a directed verdict at trial and it cannot now be raised for the first time on appeal, , , , , in support thereof.
- State v. Cumbo 396 P.2d 11 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Cumbo 396 P.2d 11 Ariz. 1964