Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Members of the Board of Education of the Pearce Union High School District v. Leslie, 543 P.2d 775.

40 citing documents.

In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to M.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
In Re Termination of Parental Rights as to M.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2025
v. Leslie, (“[C]ourts must observe the natural import of the language used and are not free to extend the meaning though the result may be harsh, unjust or mistaken policy.”).
Johnson Utilities LLC v. Arizona Corporation Ariz. 2020
Johnson Utilities LLC v. Arizona Corporation Ariz. 2020
v. Leslie, (stating that when “may” follows “shall” in the same provision, a court presumes that the drafters intended different meanings for different terms; as a result, “shall” is given its ordinary permissive construction, and “may” is construed as directory); see also Gutierrez v. Indus.
State v. Jones 424 P.3d 447 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Jones 424 P.3d 447 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
v. Leslie, (“[W]here the language of a statute is plain or unambiguous and the meaning does not lead to an impossibility or an absurdity, courts must observe the natural import of the language used and are not free to extend the meaning though the result may be harsh, unjust or mistaken policy.”) (citation omitted).
Marriage of Doty-Perez v. Doty-Perez 388 P.3d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Marriage of Doty-Perez v. Doty-Perez 388 P.3d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
v. Leslie, (citation omitted).
Kimu P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 178 P.3d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Kimu P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 178 P.3d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation 167 P.3d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
City of Chandler v. Arizona Department of Transportation 167 P.3d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Curtis v. Richardson 131 P.3d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Curtis v. Richardson 131 P.3d 480 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 869 P.2d 500 Ariz. 1994
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 869 P.2d 500 Ariz. 1994
Yet, “[e]qually fundamental is the presumption that what the Legislature means, it will say.” Padilla v. Industrial Comm’n, , , , -44 (1953).
State v. Sandoval 857 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Sandoval 857 P.2d 395 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Bouchier 767 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Bouchier 767 P.2d 233 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Ramos 747 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Ramos 747 P.2d 629 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
v. Leslie, , , -70 (1960).
Harrelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Harrelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 697 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Arizona Security Center, Inc. v. State 689 P.2d 185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Arizona Security Center, Inc. v. State 689 P.2d 185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
In Re Marriage of Berger 680 P.2d 1217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
In Re Marriage of Berger 680 P.2d 1217 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Rowe v. Schultz 642 P.2d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Rowe v. Schultz 642 P.2d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
Banta v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 636 P.2d 1254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Banta v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 636 P.2d 1254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Building Products Co. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 604 P.2d 1148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Building Products Co. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 604 P.2d 1148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
v. Leslie, , , , Odle v. Shamrock Dairy of Phoenix, Inc., 7 Ariz.App., 515 , See, A.R.S.
Industrial Com'n v. Superior Court, Etc. 595 P.2d 166 Ariz. 1979
Industrial Com'n v. Superior Court, Etc. 595 P.2d 166 Ariz. 1979
The settled rule of law is that the Legislature’s intent is first to be determined from the statute’s language, , and if a statute is plain and unambiguous, there is no room for judicial construction.
Anderson v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n 571 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Anderson v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n 571 P.2d 1042 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Arizona State Board of Accountancy v. Keebler 564 P.2d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Arizona State Board of Accountancy v. Keebler 564 P.2d 928 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
v. Leslie, , , , Odle v. Shamrock Dairy of Phoenix, Inc., 7 Ariz.App.