Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Preis, 362 P.2d 660.
-
State v. Ortiz
399 P.2d 171
Ariz. 1965
661: “If the trial court concludes thereafter that the confession was freely and voluntarily made or there is a conflict as .
- State v. Triplett 393 P.2d 666 Ariz. 1964
-
State v. Triplett
393 P.2d 666
Ariz. 1964
He subsequently qualified this statement by saying defendant did know the difference between right and wrong but was acting under a compulsion to behave as he did— a
- State v. McGilbry 392 P.2d 297 Ariz. 1964
-
State v. McGilbry
392 P.2d 297
Ariz. 1964
that it is the better and safer course to advise the defendant that what he says could be used against him at the trial, applies to both confessions and admissions, but it is not necessary to render either a confession or admission admissible.
- State v. Schroeder 389 P.2d 255 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Schroeder 389 P.2d 255 Ariz. 1964
- State v. Izzo 383 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Izzo 383 P.2d 116 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Rivera 381 P.2d 584 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Rivera 381 P.2d 584 Ariz. 1963
- State v. Mathis 375 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1962
- State v. Mathis 375 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1962