Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. McGee, 370 P.2d 261.

64 citing documents.

State v. Ring 65 P.3d 915 Ariz. 2003
State v. Ring 65 P.3d 915 Ariz. 2003
E.g., Ariz.Code § 43-2903 (1939); Ariz.Code § 4585 (1928); -12 , (“The determination of punishment is wholly within the discretion of the jury upon their consideration of all aspects of the ease.”)
Duke v. Cochise County 938 P.2d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Duke v. Cochise County 938 P.2d 84 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
cert, denied, 371 U.S. 844 , 83 S.Ct.
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
“A judgment of conviction will not be reversed for disregarding formal provisions of the law regarding the manner and selection of juries if a fair and impartial jury was secured.” , , cert.
State v. Lopez 786 P.2d 959 Ariz. 1990
State v. Lopez 786 P.2d 959 Ariz. 1990
State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
See also, Phoenix Newspapers, , , , cert.
State v. Smith 569 P.2d 817 Ariz. 1977
State v. Smith 569 P.2d 817 Ariz. 1977
State v. Richmond 540 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1975
State v. Richmond 540 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1975
State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
which holds that a motion for inspection of statements of defendant and other documents is addressed to the sound discretion of the court.
State v. Wilder 529 P.2d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Wilder 529 P.2d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
wherein the Arizona Supreme Court held that a refusal to permit inspection of the lie detector test was proper since the result was not and could not be evidence in itself.
State v. Cordova 511 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1973
State v. Cordova 511 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1973
1985 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1966); , , , cert.
State v. Brierly 509 P.2d 203 Ariz. 1973
State v. Brierly 509 P.2d 203 Ariz. 1973
State v. Endreson 506 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1973
State v. Endreson 506 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1973
1985 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1966); , , , cert.
Zarate v. Jennings 498 P.2d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Zarate v. Jennings 498 P.2d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Schmid 484 P.2d 187 Ariz. 1971
State v. Schmid 484 P.2d 187 Ariz. 1971
1985 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1966); , , cert.
State v. Mojarro Padilla 483 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1971
State v. Mojarro Padilla 483 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1971
The jury panel was drawn from a list of registered voters and were summoned by telephone calls, being placed between 2:00 and 4:00 p. m. This court, , cert.
State v. Sellers 475 P.2d 722 Ariz. 1970
State v. Sellers 475 P.2d 722 Ariz. 1970
And if such is the case the killing is murder of the *317 first degree, no matter how rapidly these acts of mind may succeed each other or how quickly they may be followed by the act of killing.” , , , cert.
State v. Mahoney 475 P.2d 479 Ariz. 1970
State v. Mahoney 475 P.2d 479 Ariz. 1970
at p. 109 , ; , ; , 243 P. 601 .
State v. Johns 460 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1969
State v. Johns 460 P.2d 177 Ariz. 1969
We have held that the formation of an intention to kill — and the killing — may be as instantaneous as successive thoughts: , , ; , 151 P. 952 ; and May v. State, 232 Ind.
State v. Bowen 449 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1969
State v. Bowen 449 P.2d 603 Ariz. 1969
1826 , 16 L.Ed 2d 908 (1966)
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Superior Court 445 P.2d 441 Ariz. 1968
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Superior Court 445 P.2d 441 Ariz. 1968
That the power reposed in superior *468 , wherein it was held: “An order granting or denying defendant’s motion for inspection of statements of defendant and other documents is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court.” 91 Ariz. at 106 , 370 P.2d at 264 (1962).
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPA 433 P.2d 65 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPA 433 P.2d 65 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
our Arizona Supreme Court held, on appeal from a judgment of conviction, that a refusal to grant the defendant’s motion to inspect statements made by an accomplice, the only eyewitness to the homicide, did not constitute an abuse of the trial court’s discretion.
Peart v. Superior Court 429 P.2d 498 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
Peart v. Superior Court 429 P.2d 498 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1967
State v. Neil 419 P.2d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Neil 419 P.2d 388 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Rogers 419 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Rogers 419 P.2d 102 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1966
State v. Narten 407 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1965
State v. Narten 407 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1965
The jury list shall contain the names of persons qualified to be jurors * íj« * ,f , , cert.