Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Rochlin v. State, 540 P.2d 643.

27 citing documents.

State v. Tunkey Ariz. 2023
State v. Tunkey Ariz. 2023
Co., ¶ 28 (2022); see generally Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 170 (2012) (“[A] material variation in terms suggests a variation in meaning.”).
Robert Burns v. Arizona Public Service Co Ariz. 2022
Robert Burns v. Arizona Public Service Co Ariz. 2022
(“If the authors of the constitution had intended the sections to mean the same thing they could have used the same or similar language.
State v. Mixton 447 P.3d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
State v. Mixton 447 P.3d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2019
(citing Rochlin v. State , , 176, , 648 (1975) )).
State of Arizona v. Anthony Lito Hernandez 417 P.3d 207 Ariz. 2018
Turken v. Gordon 207 P.3d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Turken v. Gordon 207 P.3d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
(holding that pension plans are not gifts, but part of the contemplated compensation for employee services); , (holding that a pension is not a gratuity or gift when the pension provision is part of a statute that contemplate
Long v. Napolitano 53 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Long v. Napolitano 53 P.3d 172 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
(noting limitations on state and local debt adopted by states as a reaction to irresponsible borrowing).
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior Court 972 P.2d 179 Ariz. 1999
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior Court 972 P.2d 179 Ariz. 1999
Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale 930 P.2d 993 Ariz. 1997
Home Builders Ass'n v. City of Scottsdale 930 P.2d 993 Ariz. 1997
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen’s Foundation, -57 , -60 (1981)
Bird v. State 908 P.2d 12 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Bird v. State 908 P.2d 12 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Lycett, 133 Ariz. at 190 , 650 P.2d at 492 .
McClead v. Pima County 849 P.2d 1378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
McClead v. Pima County 849 P.2d 1378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
the court held that a pension is not a gratuity but compensation for services rendered and “[t]he Constitution of the State grants the Legislature the latitude to provide pension benefit increases of [this] kind ...
State v. Padilla 817 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Padilla 817 P.2d 15 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Lycett 650 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Lycett 650 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. SUPERIOR CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMA 585 P.2d 882 Ariz. 1978
State v. SUPERIOR CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF PIMA 585 P.2d 882 Ariz. 1978
1028 , 10 L.Ed.2d 93 (1963)
Cochise County v. Dandoy 567 P.2d 1182 Ariz. 1977
Cochise County v. Dandoy 567 P.2d 1182 Ariz. 1977
and earlier cases for the proposition that the court must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt in order to declare statutes unconstitutional.