Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Weis, 375 P.2d 735.

36 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Antone Alex Gill 319 P.3d 248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Antone Alex Gill 319 P.3d 248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
“[T]o establish corpus delicti there must appear some proof of a certain result, and that some one is criminally responsible therefor.”
State v. JONES EX REL. COUNTY OF MARICORA 6 P.3d 323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. JONES EX REL. COUNTY OF MARICORA 6 P.3d 323 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior Court 933 P.2d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior Court 933 P.2d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
ANALYSIS The state contends that whether Ms. Plummer herself committed the crime charged is not a , cert.
State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
State v. Eastlack 883 P.2d 999 Ariz. 1994
State v. Cordero 851 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Cordero 851 P.2d 855 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
§ 13-319); , (involved application of former A.R.S.
State v. Marchesano 783 P.2d 247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Marchesano 783 P.2d 247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Hinkle 550 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Hinkle 550 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
P.2d 735 (1962); and State v. Flores, 9 Ariz.App.
State v. Pavao 530 P.2d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Pavao 530 P.2d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Church 504 P.2d 940 Ariz. 1973
State v. Church 504 P.2d 940 Ariz. 1973
State v. Reeden 477 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1970
State v. Reeden 477 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1970
State v. Holmes 465 P.2d 372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Holmes 465 P.2d 372 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
State v. Culver 446 P.2d 234 Ariz. 1968
State v. Culver 446 P.2d 234 Ariz. 1968
To utter means to pass or attempt to pass, , .
State v. Burton 444 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Burton 444 P.2d 743 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Smallwood 438 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Smallwood 438 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Fassler 438 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Fassler 438 P.2d 317 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
State v. Villegas 420 P.2d 940 Ariz. 1966
State v. Villegas 420 P.2d 940 Ariz. 1966
[On appeal] the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict * * * is then determined * * * by a consideration of all the evidence presented in the case.” , .
State v. Hankey 402 P.2d 418 Ariz. 1965
State v. Hankey 402 P.2d 418 Ariz. 1965
If such preliminary proof has been submitted the confession or statements may then be used to assist in proving the corpus delicti beyond a reasonable doubt, the degree necessary for conviction.” , we stated: “The criminal agency of the person charged with the crime is not a necessary element of corpus delicti.
State v. Jones 388 P.2d 806 Ariz. 1964
State v. Jones 388 P.2d 806 Ariz. 1964