Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Graham v. Asbury, 540 P.2d 656.

74 citing documents.

Mail Boxes, U.S.A. v. Industrial Commission 871 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Mail Boxes, U.S.A. v. Industrial Commission 871 P.2d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Berthot v. Security Pacific Bank 823 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Berthot v. Security Pacific Bank 823 P.2d 1326 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
“To bring an action for the breach of [a] contract, the plaintiff has the burden of proving the existence of the contract, its breach and the resulting damages.”
Certainteed Corp. v. United Pacific Insurance 762 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Certainteed Corp. v. United Pacific Insurance 762 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
“[EJstoppel means that a party is prevented by [its] own acts from claiming a right to the detriment of the other party who is entitled to rely on such conduct and has acted accordingly.” -186 , -658 (1975).
St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Reserve Life Insurance 742 P.2d 808 Ariz. 1987
St. Joseph's Hospital & Medical Center v. Reserve Life Insurance 742 P.2d 808 Ariz. 1987
CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM Estoppel § 59.
St. Joseph's Hospital v. Reserve Life Insurance 742 P.2d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
St. Joseph's Hospital v. Reserve Life Insurance 742 P.2d 804 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc. 633 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1981
Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc. 633 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1981
Coronado Co. v. Jacome's Department Store, Inc. 629 P.2d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Coronado Co. v. Jacome's Department Store, Inc. 629 P.2d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Lazard v. Medlen 624 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Lazard v. Medlen 624 P.2d 322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
Bohonus v. Amerco 602 P.2d 469 Ariz. 1979
Bohonus v. Amerco 602 P.2d 469 Ariz. 1979
Watson Construction Co. v. Amfac Mortgage Corp. 606 P.2d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Watson Construction Co. v. Amfac Mortgage Corp. 606 P.2d 421 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co. 603 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co. 603 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Ivancovich v. Meier 595 P.2d 24 Ariz. 1979
Ivancovich v. Meier 595 P.2d 24 Ariz. 1979
ms of said will; Now, Therefore * * * it is hereby declared and agreed and the parties hereto mutually covenant that full effect shall be given each and all of the terms and provisions as set forth in said last will and testament.” Estoppel is applied when “ ‘it would be unconscionable to permit a person to maintain a position inconsistent with one in which he has acquiesced.’ ”